BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 CR test 5 Q15

Expert replies
by Rashmi1804 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:38 am
Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?
(A) Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.
(B) Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.
(C) If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and the general public.
(D) There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.
(E) Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.

OA :A
My take is E.
Because if some of the species are endagered due to this new proposal to give the parks to pvt groups.

I eliminated A because, " those who would join pvt grps and exploit the power.....can as well join govt agencies and do so"

Please discuss....

thanks!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by chetanojha » Sun Apr 05, 2009 3:52 am
IMO: A


The point of argument here to conserve the resources. Since government cannot do that it is suggested to handover the same to private enterprise so that these natural resources can be preserved. But if people who want to exploit these resources somehow take leadership of these resources(thru private enterprise and abolish all restrictions place on the usage of these resources) than there is no point handing over park system to the private enter prise.
Join the discussion

by Rashmi1804 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:24 am
I see that both A and E are weakening the conclusion...what makes A and not E a better answer ??
Join the discussion

by chetanojha » Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:15 am
Statement E works in favour of the argument. So no matter how hard private enterprises try some species still die out. This can point that those species dies out anyway even with goverment looking after the park system so better handover the park system to private atleast financial resources will be there.
Join the discussion

by anshulseth » Thu Apr 09, 2009 2:09 am
E is ruled due to narrow scope.
Endagering one species doesn't make them bad at conservation.
Even it can happen if its in govt hands.

Moreover, there is a better option available in A, which says that if people with wrong intentions have got access to such pvt enterprise, then this whole conservation thot is under jeopardy.

Hence, A
Asset
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sun May 15, 2016 2:00 am
I would go with option A as the correct option
Join the discussion