BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 CR fewer children available for adoption

Expert replies
by poonam1279 » Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:06 am
There are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt. Two million couples are currently waiting to adopt, but in 1982, the last year for which figures exist, there were only some 50,000 adoptions.
Which of the following statements, if true, most strengthens the author’s claim that there are far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
(A) The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade.
(B) The number of adoptions in the current year is greater than the number of adoptions in any preceding year.
(C) The number of adoptions in a year is approximately equal to the number of children available for adoption in that period.
(D) People who seek to adopt children often go through a long process of interviews and investigation by adoption agencies.
(E) People who seek to adopt children generally make very good parents.

C
GMAT PREP 2-630
MGMAT (2):630
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by awesomeusername » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:36 am
(C) is the best answer because it is stating that virtually all kids available for adoption are adopted each year. So either there is an equal amount of couples seeking to adopt a child as there are children to adopt, OR (more likely) there are more couples seeking children to adopt than there are children available.

(D) and (E) are out for obvious reasons

(A) is out because it is possible that the number of children available for adoption has increased too. Thus there's a chance that there are enough children available for all couples to adopt.

(B) this statement appears to WEAKEN the argument.
Constant dripping hollows out a stone.
-Lucretius
Join the discussion

by artabhi » Sun Apr 11, 2010 4:17 pm
I am still unclear about the answer.. can someone pls explain...
I went with option 'A' because it days: The number of couples waiting to adopt has increased significantly in the last decade.

I think this means that there are more couple waiting as the number of children are fewer children available..

Why would the couples waiting increase if the number of children have increased...
Join the discussion

by 4GMAT_Mumbai » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:29 pm
IMO, the line of thought should be as follows:

The question asks for that answer choice to indicate that there are far fewer children available for adoption. The passage says is 50,000 is the number of adoptions which took place. It does not, at the moment, suggest that number of adoptions is equivalent to the number of children available for adoption. 'C' is the answer choice which plugs the missing link.

Look at this the other way around, had 'C' not been true; it could be that there were only 50,000 adopters in 1982 and lot more children waiting to be adopted. 'C' brings in the perspective that the limiting factor is the number of children and not the number of willing adopters.

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

by akahuja143 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:53 pm
IMO C.. Hope can get questions right like this on the G-day lol
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:44 pm
i will aslo go with "c" as it tells that as the process of adoption is too time consuming that number of couples increases with repect to no of childrens adopted. suppose last the no of couples who want to adopt child is 100 , if only 50 couples got adoptions then next year it will lag 50 no of couples.
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:16 am
I found that people are posting questions from 1000 CR and 1000 SC.

Is there any book or it is available online?

If it is online, what is the URL.
Join the discussion

by ironstar37 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:58 am
IMO (C). If the number of adoptions = number of children, then there is no supply of children left for adoption after each year.

(A) does not prove that there are fewer children. May be the number of couples waiting is increasing for other reasons.

(B) Irrelevant

(D) and (E) are out of scope.
Join the discussion

by pops » Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:33 am
how does C proves that far fewer children available for adoption than there are people who want to adopt?
I guess closest to this statement is A :(
Join the discussion