BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 cr 712

Expert replies
by magical cook » Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:45 pm
(E) there might have been an expectation it would rise
712. The commission acknowledged that no amount of money or staff members can ensure the safety of people who live in the vicinity of a nuclear plant, but it approved the installation because it believed that all reasonable precautions had been taken.
(A) no amount of money or staff members
(B) neither vast amounts of money nor staff members
(C) neither vast amounts of money nor numbers of staff members
(D) neither vast amounts of money nor a large staff
(E) no matter how large the staff or how vast the amount of money


Hi, The correct answer is D) but why "large staff" is okay? I think it should be "large number of staff"..... so confusing.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ldoolitt » Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:59 am
Well I'm no expert and I can't totally justify this...

You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...

neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members

But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.
Join the discussion

by ldoolitt » Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:38 pm
Well I'm no expert and I can't totally justify this...

You have a 'neither/nor' construct where the piece after the neither and the nor both have to be parallel. So for what you were saying you would need...

neither vast amounts of money nor a large number of staff members

But I think even that is incorrect. D seems correct.
Join the discussion

by agganitk » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:04 pm
What is wrong with "numbers of .." in option C? It there a grammatical or logical mistake ?
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:28 am
agganitk wrote:What is wrong with "numbers of .." in option C? It there a grammatical or logical mistake ?
C absurd meaning :

numbers of staff members can ensure

lets say :

numbers of staff members -> 100

so the sentence is

100 can ensure

what I want to say that
it should be 'large staff' or 'many staff members' as the subject of 'can ensure'.
numbers can't be the subject of 'can ensure'
Join the discussion

by agganitk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:48 am
On same basis of what you said, I can also not say "Vasts amount can ensure.. "
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:08 am
agganitk wrote:On same basis of what you said, I can also not say "Vasts amount can ensure.. "
vasts amounts of money -> indicating to money

while numbers of students -> indicating to some numerical integer

some expert comment more on this.
Join the discussion

by agganitk » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:27 am
but the money can also be integer such as 10 $ or 20$.
Join the discussion

by Shawshank » Sun Nov 28, 2010 3:44 am
whats wrong with "A" ???
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Join the discussion

by jaymw » Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:07 pm
What's wrong with A is that it's impossible to have an amount of staff members, because staff members are countable while money isn't.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1