Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

0<x<1

Expert replies
by adthedaddy » Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:23 am
Hi,

I came across following explanation in MGMAT Book-3. Would like to understand how it is derived.

If x^2-x<0 then 0<x<1.

Please help me understand the above statement.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Ian Stewart » Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:25 am
adthedaddy wrote:Hi,

I came across following explanation in MGMAT Book-3. Would like to understand how it is derived.

If x^2-x<0 then 0<x<1.

Please help me understand the above statement.
There are quite a few ways to analyze this type of inequality. Two algebraic solutions:

We can rewrite the inequality: x^2 < x. Now, this inequality can't be true if x is negative, since if x were negative, then x^2 would be positive and would be greater than x. So we know x > 0, and that means we can divide by x on both sides of the inequality to find x < 1. So 0 < x < 1.

Or we can factor. If x^2 - x < 0, then (x)(x-1) < 0. Now we have a product of two terms which is negative, so one of the terms is negative, the other positive. But x-1 is certainly smaller than x, so it must be that x-1 is the negative term and x the positive term. So x - 1 < 0 and thus x < 1, and x > 0, so 0 < x < 1.

Or there's a general 'number picking' approach you can use to analyze any inequality with a simple power of x on either side (so you can use this to analyze inequalities like x^3 > x^2, or 1/x^3 < 1/x, or x^98 < x^97). Test four different values of x: one value less than -1, one value between -1 and 0, one value between 0 and 1, and one greater than 1. If the inequality is true for that one value, it will be true for the entire 'zone' from which you took that value. So if you plug in, say x = -2, x = -1/2, x = 1/2 and x = 2 into the original inequality x^2 < x, we find the inequality only works for x = 1/2. So it only works for the 'zone' of values between 0 and 1, and 0 < x < 1.

That number picking strategy should only be used though in cases where you have simple powers of x on either side of an inequality. It won't typically give you the right answer in more complicated situations.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion