Statement II is clearly insufficient since it mentions nothing about either a or b.
Statement I: says that b= 3^ (n+1) and a = 2^ (n+1)…
Now with the law of exponents we know that 3^n+1 can also be written as 3^n * 3. Likewise 2^n+1 can be written as 2^n * 2.
Hence b-a = (3^n * 3) – (2^n *2) ---- 1)
2 times (3^n – 2^n) = (3^n*2) – (2^n * 2) ----- 2)
Clearly 1) is more than 2)….Hence sufficient
Answer should be A
Yahoo Groups
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
-
Cybermusings
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:29 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:2 members












