BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

X-Y?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:42 pm
grandh01 wrote:Is x - y > r - s?
(1) x > r and y < s?
(2) y = 2, s = 3, r = 5, and x = 6.

OA is D
Can someone explain A
(1) x > r and y < s
x > r and s > y
Adding both the inequalities, we get (x + s) > (r + y)
or (x - y) > (r - s), which answers the question as "yes"; SUFFICIENT.

(2) y = 2, s = 3, r = 5, and x = 6
x - y = 6 - 2 = 4
r - s = 5 - 3 = 2
Here again, (x - y) > (r - s), which answers the question as "yes"; SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:07 am
grandh01 wrote:Is x - y > r - s?
(1) x > r and y < s?
(2) y = 2, s = 3, r = 5, and x = 6.

OA is D
Can someone explain A
Adding the inequalities works well here. Or you can notice that Statement 1 guarantees that x - r is positive, and that y - s is negative. Positive numbers are always greater than negative ones, so x - r must be greater than y - s, and we have

x - r > y - s
x - y > r - s

which is what we wanted. So Statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 2 is clearly sufficient without doing any work, since if you know the precise values of all of your unknowns, of course you can answer absolutely any question at all about those unknowns. So the answer is D.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion