BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

X,3,1,12,8

Expert replies
by amamd » Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:17 am
X,3,1,12,8
If x is an integer, is the median of the 5 numbers shown greater than the average?
1 x>6
2 x is greater than the median of the 5 numbers

The OS is E :?: , Can not figure out. Could some one help? Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: X,3,1,12,8

by Ian Stewart » Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:35 am
amamd wrote:X,3,1,12,8
If x is an integer, is the median of the 5 numbers shown greater than the average?
1 x>6
2 x is greater than the median of the 5 numbers

The OS is E :?: , Can not figure out. Could some one help? Thanks!
What could the median of the set be? We have the set {1, 3, 8, 12, x}. If x is less than 3, the median will be 3. If x is between 3 and 8, the median will be x. If x is greater than 8, the median will be 8.

What is the average of the set? (24+x)/5.

All right, let's look at the statements:

1) x > 6. This gives two possibilities. Either 6 < x <8, and x is the median, or x >=8, and 8 is the median. Let's only look at the second case, where the median is 8, and find out what must be true for the median to be greater than the average:

8 > (24+x)/5
40 > 24 + x
16 > x

If x <16, then the median will be greater than the average. If x >= 16, the median will not be greater than the average. Insufficient.

2) If x > 8, then x is greater than the median. From the work above, this is insufficient- we really want to know whether x is smaller than 16.

Together, they're still insufficient; we still don't know if x is larger than 16.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:59 pm
Nice explanation, Ian. I might add, as always :)
Join the discussion

by Thouraya » Tue May 31, 2011 7:42 am
@Ian, if I use the process of plugging numbers; how can I possibly know that once we reach to 16, the statement won't be sufficient anymore? I tried a few numbers, and they all worked, so I was about to assume that A is sufficient.

Also, I did not really understand what they mean by statement 2: Can I assume that it is insufficient, as I don't know what x is and the median depends on the value of x?


Thanks!
Join the discussion

by cans » Tue May 31, 2011 8:30 am
Thouraya wrote:if I use the process of plugging numbers; how can I possibly know that once we reach to 16, the statement won't be sufficient anymore? I tried a few numbers, and they all worked, so I was about to assume that A is sufficient.

Also, I did not really understand what they mean by statement 2: Can I assume that it is insufficient, as I don't know what x is and the median depends on the value of x?
To find if median>mean?
mean = (24+x)/5
Thus to find if median>(24+x)/5
or 5*median>24+x
a)x>6
take x=7, median = 7 and thus 5*7>24+7
Now if we take x>=8, median will always remain 8
and thus to find if 40>24+x
Here while plugging values you must notice that L.H.S is fixed while R.H.S can be as large as possible (no constraint on x other than x>=8)
Thus there will come a point when r.h.s. exceeds l.h.s. and thus not sufficient.
b)x>median => x is not the median and thus median is 8 and x>8
so equation becomes: 40>24+x (again no constraint on x and thus insufficient.)
Join the discussion

by hardikm » Tue May 31, 2011 9:31 am
average = (24+ x)/5
Case I
x = 7 Average =31/5 = 6.2 median = 7 average < median
x = 101 Average= 125/5 = 25 median = 8 average > median

Case II
1,3,8,9,12
x = 9 average = 33/5 = 6.5 median = 8
x = 101 Average= 125/5 = 25 median = 8 average > median

Combining:
still x > 8 so example mentioned for Case II still holds true.
Join the discussion