BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Sc question...kindly provide explanation

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:08 am
GMAT Score:710
by RaviKiran » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:24 am
140.As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.

(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

the answer was mentioned as C. I picked B...... However, I am unable to get the reason why not B and why C.
Can anyone clarify about these structural signposts (however, yet, furthermore) when to use and when not to use...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 74 times

by uwhusky » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:54 am
One reason to choose C over B is that "yet" is a conjunction, "furthermore" is only an adverb.
Yep.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:15 am
Location: 127.0.0.1
Thanked: 15 times

by gmatrix » Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:19 am
However, I am unable to get the reason why not B and why C.
Can anyone clarify about these structural signposts (however, yet, furthermore) when to use and when not to use...
hi........
Yet & However-are counter premise indicators....they signal a contrast/shift from an earlier stated idea/opinion/fact etc
Furthermore-just adds too an idea....supports it...usually its non-essential piece of an argument.

as for choice C......yet correctly signals the shift/contrast.....they are hard hit...can no longer qualify to buy homes...yet are forced to spend more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing

maybe an expert can weigh in here with his/her thoughts.......
Life is all about ass; you're either covering it, laughing it off, kicking it, kissing it, busting it, trying to get a piece of it, or behaving like one.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times

by kvcpk » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:01 am
I agree with both the posts above.

I have a query here:

"rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing"

Is this an Independent clause?
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 amFollowed by: 6 members
Thanked: 70 times

by niksworth » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:13 am
kvcpk wrote:I agree with both the posts above.

I have a query here:

"rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing"

Is this an Independent clause?
I think yes.

Subject - rising rental rates
Verb - force
scio me nihil scire
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 215 times

by kvcpk » Tue Sep 21, 2010 8:23 am
niksworth wrote: I think yes.

Subject - rising rental rates
Verb - force
Thanks Niksworth.

I think in that case answer to this question can be derived another way too. 2 independent clauses can only be combined using FANBOYS (For,And,Not,But,Or,Yet,So)
So, we can eliminate all but A and C.

Since the context is speaking about 2 related events and not 2 different events, AND cannot be used.

pick C.
"Once you start working on something,
don't be afraid of failure and don't abandon it.
People who work sincerely are the happiest."
Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350 BC-275BC)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 amFollowed by: 6 members
Thanked: 70 times

by niksworth » Tue Sep 21, 2010 9:13 am
That was a good spot.
scio me nihil scire
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:42 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 14 times
GMAT Score:710

by ankurmit » Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:27 am
I agree that 2 independent clauses can only be combined using FANBOYS (For,And,Not,But,Or,Yet,So)

But I am not convinced with the use of " YET"

Here contrast is not required


they are hard hit...can no longer qualify to buy homes....... .........are forced to spend more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.

We are just adding something that is supporting that idea..Yet can be used to join two independent clauses that contrast each other.

Here the two clauses are supporting each other.

Please clarify
--------
Ankur mittal
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1