BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data Sufficiency Problem..

Expert replies
by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:35 pm
Hi There,

I'm new and this is my first post. Im stuck on a question, which looks easy but I am having trouble understanding what its asking. The questions is:

"If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?
1) 5x + 1 = 3 + 2x
2) 0 < X < 1

I know in statement 1 x is 2/3 but don't understand the question. The answer is D. Can anyone help?

Thanks!
ODOD
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: Data Sufficiency Problem..

by logitech » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:50 pm
"If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

1) 5x + 1 = 3 + 2x

3x=2 so X is 2/3. 0.6


0 ... 0.6.......1

[x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x

So yes [x] can be 0 SUF




2) 0 < X < 1

Same logic with the first statement

0......x........1

[x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:03 pm
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..

I think im overlooking something really simple here; let me know if you see it.
ODOD
Join the discussion

by dipla » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:04 pm
Here the question is - "IS [X]=0" ?

You have to answer yes or no.

Firstly you know if x is between -1 and 0 then only [X]=0 or else it will be
[X] not equal to 0.

1) x=0.6 ( Our answer No , it is not 0 )
2) x between 0 and 1 ( Our answer No, it is not 0 )

So in both cases you are able to answer (without doubts) So we can answer the question with any given condition- D
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:24 pm
odod wrote:If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..
Yes, exactly: [9] is the greatest integer which is less than or equal to 9. What is the largest integer which is less than or equal to 9? It's 9. Essentially the [ ] function just rounds down to the nearest integer: [5.8] = 5, [17.1] = 17, [-0.3] = -1. The [ ] function is not in any way related to absolute value.

Now, in the question, from the first statement you can get a numerical answer for x, so you can certainly answer any question about x (even if you don't understand what the [ ] does precisely, hopefully it's clear that this statement is sufficient). The second statement tells us that 0 < x < 1, and if this is true, no matter what x is, [x] will round down to 0.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:36 pm
thanks gentlemen...makes sense now.
ODOD
Join the discussion

by r321 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:54 am
Ian Stewart wrote:
odod wrote:If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..
Yes, exactly: [9] is the greatest integer which is less than or equal to 9. What is the largest integer which is less than or equal to 9? It's 9. Essentially the [ ] function just rounds down to the nearest integer: [5.8] = 5, [17.1] = 17, [-0.3] = -1. The [ ] function is not in any way related to absolute value.

Now, in the question, from the first statement you can get a numerical answer for x, so you can certainly answer any question about x (even if you don't understand what the [ ] does precisely, hopefully it's clear that this statement is sufficient). The second statement tells us that 0 < x < 1, and if this is true, no matter what x is, [x] will round down to 0.
Hi,

I came across this question in OG12 as well. While I managed to solve the question correctly, reading the official answer explanation has confused me.

It says "It will be useful to observe that the condition [x] = 0 is equivalent to 0 ≤ x < 1." How?? I don't understand!

Can someone please help me understand how [x] = 0 is equivalent to 0 ≤ x < 1 .. Thanks!!
Join the discussion