BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Data Sufficiency Problem..

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1 times
by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:35 pm
Hi There,

I'm new and this is my first post. Im stuck on a question, which looks easy but I am having trouble understanding what its asking. The questions is:

"If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?
1) 5x + 1 = 3 + 2x
2) 0 < X < 1

I know in statement 1 x is 2/3 but don't understand the question. The answer is D. Can anyone help?

Thanks!
ODOD
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

Re: Data Sufficiency Problem..

by logitech » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:50 pm
"If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

1) 5x + 1 = 3 + 2x

3x=2 so X is 2/3. 0.6


0 ... 0.6.......1

[x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x

So yes [x] can be 0 SUF




2) 0 < X < 1

Same logic with the first statement

0......x........1

[x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1 times

by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:03 pm
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..

I think im overlooking something really simple here; let me know if you see it.
ODOD
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by dipla » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:04 pm
Here the question is - "IS [X]=0" ?

You have to answer yes or no.

Firstly you know if x is between -1 and 0 then only [X]=0 or else it will be
[X] not equal to 0.

1) x=0.6 ( Our answer No , it is not 0 )
2) x between 0 and 1 ( Our answer No, it is not 0 )

So in both cases you are able to answer (without doubts) So we can answer the question with any given condition- D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:24 pm
odod wrote:If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..
Yes, exactly: [9] is the greatest integer which is less than or equal to 9. What is the largest integer which is less than or equal to 9? It's 9. Essentially the [ ] function just rounds down to the nearest integer: [5.8] = 5, [17.1] = 17, [-0.3] = -1. The [ ] function is not in any way related to absolute value.

Now, in the question, from the first statement you can get a numerical answer for x, so you can certainly answer any question about x (even if you don't understand what the [ ] does precisely, hopefully it's clear that this statement is sufficient). The second statement tells us that 0 < x < 1, and if this is true, no matter what x is, [x] will round down to 0.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1 times

by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:36 pm
thanks gentlemen...makes sense now.
ODOD
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:28 am

by r321 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:54 am
Ian Stewart wrote:
odod wrote:If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..
Yes, exactly: [9] is the greatest integer which is less than or equal to 9. What is the largest integer which is less than or equal to 9? It's 9. Essentially the [ ] function just rounds down to the nearest integer: [5.8] = 5, [17.1] = 17, [-0.3] = -1. The [ ] function is not in any way related to absolute value.

Now, in the question, from the first statement you can get a numerical answer for x, so you can certainly answer any question about x (even if you don't understand what the [ ] does precisely, hopefully it's clear that this statement is sufficient). The second statement tells us that 0 < x < 1, and if this is true, no matter what x is, [x] will round down to 0.
Hi,

I came across this question in OG12 as well. While I managed to solve the question correctly, reading the official answer explanation has confused me.

It says "It will be useful to observe that the condition [x] = 0 is equivalent to 0 ≤ x < 1." How?? I don't understand!

Can someone please help me understand how [x] = 0 is equivalent to 0 ≤ x < 1 .. Thanks!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1