BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Word Problem : Manhattan Gmat Chapter 7:Scheduling

Expert replies
by Anantjit » Thu May 19, 2016 2:02 am
How many days after the purchase of Product X does its standard warranty expire?
(1997 is not a leap year.)
(1) When Mark purchased Product X in January 1997, the warranty did not expire
until March 1997.
(2) When Santos purchased Product X in May 1997, the warranty expired in May
1997.

Solution : Rephrase the two statements in terms of extreme possibilities:
(1) Shortest possible warranty period: Jan. 31 to Mar. 1 (29 days later)
Longest possible warranty period: Jan. 1 to Mar. 31 (89 days later)
Note that 1997 was not a leap year.
(2) Shortest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 2, or similar (1 day later)
Longest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 31 (30 days later)
Even taking both statements together, there are still two possibilities-29 days and 30 days -so both
statements together are still insufficient.

I don't understand why are we considering Shortest period from 1st statement and Longest period from 2nd statement?

How do we derive warranty period from above extreme scenarios ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Thu May 19, 2016 8:12 am
Anantjit wrote:How many days after the purchase of Product X does its standard warranty expire?
(1997 is not a leap year.)
(1) When Mark purchased Product X in January 1997, the warranty did not expire
until March 1997.
(2) When Santos purchased Product X in May 1997, the warranty expired in May
1997.

Solution : Rephrase the two statements in terms of extreme possibilities:
(1) Shortest possible warranty period: Jan. 31 to Mar. 1 (29 days later)
Longest possible warranty period: Jan. 1 to Mar. 31 (89 days later)
Note that 1997 was not a leap year.
(2) Shortest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 2, or similar (1 day later)
Longest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 31 (30 days later)
Even taking both statements together, there are still two possibilities-29 days and 30 days -so both
statements together are still insufficient.

I don't understand why are we considering Shortest period from 1st statement and Longest period from 2nd statement?

How do we derive warranty period from above extreme scenarios ?
Imagine that the original question was "What is the value of integer x?"

Now imagine the two statements as inequalities.

Statement 1: 28 < x < 90
(Clearly not sufficient. x could be 29 or 30 or 50 or 89, etc.)

Statement 2: 0 < x < 31
(Clearly not sufficient. x could be 1 or 2 or 15 or 30, etc.)

Together, we want to consider the overlap of the two statements. The overlap of 28 < x < 90 and 0 < x < 31 is x = 29 and x = 30. Or, put another way, 29 and 30 are the only integers that would fall within both ranges. Because we cannot derive a unique value of x, the statements together are still not sufficient.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion