Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Word Problem : Manhattan Gmat Chapter 7:Scheduling

Expert replies
by Anantjit » Thu May 19, 2016 2:02 am
How many days after the purchase of Product X does its standard warranty expire?
(1997 is not a leap year.)
(1) When Mark purchased Product X in January 1997, the warranty did not expire
until March 1997.
(2) When Santos purchased Product X in May 1997, the warranty expired in May
1997.

Solution : Rephrase the two statements in terms of extreme possibilities:
(1) Shortest possible warranty period: Jan. 31 to Mar. 1 (29 days later)
Longest possible warranty period: Jan. 1 to Mar. 31 (89 days later)
Note that 1997 was not a leap year.
(2) Shortest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 2, or similar (1 day later)
Longest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 31 (30 days later)
Even taking both statements together, there are still two possibilities—29 days and 30 days —so both
statements together are still insufficient.

I don't understand why are we considering Shortest period from 1st statement and Longest period from 2nd statement?

How do we derive warranty period from above extreme scenarios ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Thu May 19, 2016 8:12 am
Anantjit wrote:How many days after the purchase of Product X does its standard warranty expire?
(1997 is not a leap year.)
(1) When Mark purchased Product X in January 1997, the warranty did not expire
until March 1997.
(2) When Santos purchased Product X in May 1997, the warranty expired in May
1997.

Solution : Rephrase the two statements in terms of extreme possibilities:
(1) Shortest possible warranty period: Jan. 31 to Mar. 1 (29 days later)
Longest possible warranty period: Jan. 1 to Mar. 31 (89 days later)
Note that 1997 was not a leap year.
(2) Shortest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 2, or similar (1 day later)
Longest possible warranty period: May 1 to May 31 (30 days later)
Even taking both statements together, there are still two possibilities—29 days and 30 days —so both
statements together are still insufficient.

I don't understand why are we considering Shortest period from 1st statement and Longest period from 2nd statement?

How do we derive warranty period from above extreme scenarios ?
Imagine that the original question was "What is the value of integer x?"

Now imagine the two statements as inequalities.

Statement 1: 28 < x < 90
(Clearly not sufficient. x could be 29 or 30 or 50 or 89, etc.)

Statement 2: 0 < x < 31
(Clearly not sufficient. x could be 1 or 2 or 15 or 30, etc.)

Together, we want to consider the overlap of the two statements. The overlap of 28 < x < 90 and 0 < x < 31 is x = 29 and x = 30. Or, put another way, 29 and 30 are the only integers that would fall within both ranges. Because we cannot derive a unique value of x, the statements together are still not sufficient.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion