BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

wine profit

Expert replies
by gkkk » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:57 pm
Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for wine has not increased in recent years. Yet, even though prices and production amounts have also been stable during the last three years, wine producers last year increased their pro�ts by more than 10 percent over the previous year's level.

Any of the following statements, if true about last year, helps to explain the rise in pro�ts EXCEPT:

A - Consumers in many countries increased their home stockpiles of bottles of wine, yet their overall consumption of wine decreased.
B - Wine producers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested.
C - The price of oil, the major energy source used by wine producers in harvesting their crops, dropped by over 20 percent.
D - Many small wine producers joined together to form an association of wine producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates.
E - Rainfall in wine-producing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive arti�cial irrigation.

OA - A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gkkk » Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:15 pm
I am really stuck here. I selected B . Below is my reasoning for the same.

demand of wine has not increased [This means it's either static or not decreased.]
last 3 yrs, price and production is also stable [lets call it no profit no loss.]

last year there profit increased by 10%. means something happened there. this is EXCEPT question so except one all will explain this.

A - Consumers in many countries increased their home stockpiles of bottles of wine, yet their overall consumption of wine decreased. -- if you increase home stockpile even if you are not drinking it will bring a profit to the producer. suppose a person drink 10 bottles in whole yr. and he stockpiled >=10. [profit]
if he stockpiled less then 10 then loss. --- still some profit is there so i kept it as profit in cases.

B - Wine producers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested. --- suppose they pay $10 per hr, for 100 hrs harvesting work. now they pay one time.
after negotiations it turn out to be $1000. [no profit cases], paying hr. is more profitable anyways then later one.[i suppose this is not helping us.]

C - The price of oil, the major energy source used by wine producers in harvesting their crops, dropped by over 20 percent. --- profit in transportation, make sense.

D - Many small wine producers joined together to form an association of wine producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates. --- some how it is smelling profit to me.

E - Rainfall in wine-producing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive arti�cial irrigation. --- saving some money in producing harvests [profit]

confused in A and B. both can be partial answers. even though if i have to select i will go with B.

Experts, any help will be most appreciable.

Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:27 am
demand of wine has not increased [This means it's either static or not decreased.]
last 3 yrs, price and production is also stable [lets call it no profit no loss.]

last year there profit increased by 10%. means something happened there. this is EXCEPT question so except one all will explain this.
You're absolutely right! But take this one step further: if demand, price, and production all stayed constant but profit went up, then COSTS must have gone down. We need to find 4 answer choices that suggest that there are lower costs.

A - Consumers in many countries increased their home stockpiles of bottles of wine, yet their overall consumption of wine decreased.
This doesn't actually affect cost (or demand or production). In this argument, we don't care why people wine (what the demand is for specifically). We only care about what accounted for a difference in profit. This is irrelevant.

You said:
- if you increase home stockpile even if you are not drinking it will bring a profit to the producer
This is not necessarily true. It might increase REVENUE, but not necessarily profit. And since we're told that stockpiles increased while consumption decreased, we're led to believe that purchases were roughly constant.

B - Wine producers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested.
This helps to explain lower COSTS, and thus higher profit. That's not the same as saying it PROVES why profits increased (hourly wages could lead to higher costs or they could lead to lower costs, as you mentioned). But this might help to explain the scenario.

C - The price of oil, the major energy source used by wine producers in harvesting their crops, dropped by over 20 percent.

A lowered COST - this helps.

D - Many small wine producers joined together to form an association of wine producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates.
Lower COST of supplies - this helps.

E - Rainfall in wine-producing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive arti�cial irrigation.

Saving $ = lower costs. This helps.

The only answer that doesn't indicate (at least the potential for) lower costs is A.

Please also POST YOUR SOURCE. Tell us where you got this question.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by gkkk » Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:14 pm
Thanks ceilidh . That is making some sense to me now :)

Below is the link for the same.
https://www.gmatfree.com/module-83/wine-profits/
Join the discussion

by AjiteshArun » Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:44 pm
gkkk wrote:Below is the link for the same.
https://www.gmatfree.com/module-83/wine-profits/
You might as well solve the actual GMAT question that this one is based on (Q51, OG 2016).
Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has not increased in recent years. Yet, even though prices and production amounts have also been stable during the last three years, sugarcane growers last year increased their pro�ts by more than 10 percent over the previous year's level.
Join the discussion