BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question on basic grammer : SC

Expert replies
by ani781 » Fri Sep 20, 2013 4:39 pm
In contrast to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States trade deficit with Mexico declined by $500 million as a result of record exports to that country.

A) In contrast to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States trade deficit with Mexico declined by $500 million as a result of record exports to that country.
B) In contrast to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing its trade deficit by $500 million.
C) When compared with ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing their trade deficit by $500 million.
D) Compared with ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing the trade deficit by $500 million.
E) Compared to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing the trade deficit by $500 million.


I want to know in option A, why isn't there any apostrophe , I mean why isn't it "the United States' trade deficit ...".... very basic question perhaps.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by vinay1983 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:13 am
I think here we are referring to the country that has a trade deficit, rather than showing possession inside the country.

states' might imply that the economy is inside the states.Hope I could help.

Check this out. https://oxforddictionaries.com/words/apostrophe

It's (not its' or its) not a bad idea to ask such questions, but was unexpected at least to me.

Cheers!
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion

by ani781 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:26 am
Well that's alright ... "The US trade deficit with Mexico" - sounds even better.
But we never hear something like - "India trade deficit with Mexico"... I am sure it's got to be "India's trade deficit with Mexico" .. isn't it ?
Any idea anyone , what is guiding the apostrophe rule here ?
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:59 am
ani781 wrote:Well that's alright ... "The US trade deficit with Mexico" - sounds even better.
But we never hear something like - "India trade deficit with Mexico"... I am sure it's got to be "India's trade deficit with Mexico" .. isn't it ?
Any idea anyone , what is guiding the apostrophe rule here ?
The reason I believe is that:

Case 1: The executive's decisions were not effective ---> We are talking about "Executive", singular

Case 2: The executives' decisions were not effective ---> We are talking about "Executives", plural..

Now, if we write "United States' trade deficit with Mexico declined by $500 million" ---> it gives false meaning... As United States is Singular..

Maybe it's an exception to apostrophe rule...
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by ani781 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:31 pm
Rahul, that is really a very neat observation. Thanks for chipping in.
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:33 pm
ani781 wrote:Rahul, that is really a very neat observation. Thanks for chipping in.
You are welcome...
R A H U L
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1