Question on basic grammer : SC

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:35 am
Location: Edison
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members

Question on basic grammer : SC

by ani781 » Fri Sep 20, 2013 4:39 pm
In contrast to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States trade deficit with Mexico declined by $500 million as a result of record exports to that country.

A) In contrast to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States trade deficit with Mexico declined by $500 million as a result of record exports to that country.
B) In contrast to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing its trade deficit by $500 million.
C) When compared with ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing their trade deficit by $500 million.
D) Compared with ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing the trade deficit by $500 million.
E) Compared to ongoing trade imbalances with China and Japan, the United States sold record exports to Mexico, reducing the trade deficit by $500 million.


I want to know in option A, why isn't there any apostrophe , I mean why isn't it "the United States' trade deficit ...".... very basic question perhaps.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:7 members

by vinay1983 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:13 am
I think here we are referring to the country that has a trade deficit, rather than showing possession inside the country.

states' might imply that the economy is inside the states.Hope I could help.

Check this out. https://oxforddictionaries.com/words/apostrophe

It's (not its' or its) not a bad idea to ask such questions, but was unexpected at least to me.

Cheers!
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:35 am
Location: Edison
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members

by ani781 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:26 am
Well that's alright ... "The US trade deficit with Mexico" - sounds even better.
But we never hear something like - "India trade deficit with Mexico"... I am sure it's got to be "India's trade deficit with Mexico" .. isn't it ?
Any idea anyone , what is guiding the apostrophe rule here ?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Sat Sep 21, 2013 10:59 am
ani781 wrote:Well that's alright ... "The US trade deficit with Mexico" - sounds even better.
But we never hear something like - "India trade deficit with Mexico"... I am sure it's got to be "India's trade deficit with Mexico" .. isn't it ?
Any idea anyone , what is guiding the apostrophe rule here ?
The reason I believe is that:

Case 1: The executive's decisions were not effective ---> We are talking about "Executive", singular

Case 2: The executives' decisions were not effective ---> We are talking about "Executives", plural..

Now, if we write "United States' trade deficit with Mexico declined by $500 million" ---> it gives false meaning... As United States is Singular..

Maybe it's an exception to apostrophe rule...
R A H U L

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:35 am
Location: Edison
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members

by ani781 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 5:31 pm
Rahul, that is really a very neat observation. Thanks for chipping in.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:33 pm
ani781 wrote:Rahul, that is really a very neat observation. Thanks for chipping in.
You are welcome...
R A H U L

• Page 1 of 1