Parallelogram DS

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:21 am
soln...atached
Attachments
untitled.JPG

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:41 am

by ankit.k.shrivastava » Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:55 am
sorry for posting it in the PS section. Mods please move it to the DS section.

The diagram may also look like this?

the parallelograms are in the same plane

Image

** edited the original post
Last edited by ankit.k.shrivastava on Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:31 am
ankit.k.shrivastava wrote:sorry for posting it in the Ps section. Mods please move it to the DS section.


The diagram may also look like this?

Image
[/img]
IMO the dig can not look like the way you have shown . For it to be true the <r has to be 90 deg........
i think we can not assume that bth llgms are in diff plane

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:41 am

by ankit.k.shrivastava » Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:55 am
anyone anyone ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:55 am
Thanked: 11 times

by Giorgio » Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:42 pm
Answer to this problem is clearly C!

Because there are many ways to draw two parallelograms sharing the same side.