BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

WHICH VZ apostrophe modifies expert help

Expert replies
by arghya05 » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:23 am
Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea Sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there

A.
B. Baltic Sea sediments, where the growth of industrial activity is consistent with these findings
C. Baltic Sea sediments, findings consistent with its growth of industrial activity
D. sediments from the Baltic Sea, findings consistent with the growth of industrial activity in the area
E. sediments from the Baltic Sea, with the growth of industrial activity there

findings consistent with the growth of industrial activity in the area i guess is a apostrophe modifier which modifes large concentrations, but again
i knew that apostrophe modifier modifies the nearest noun as Baltic Sea

so if apostrophe modifies a far reaching noun
which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity in choice A may also modify large concentrations

please explain this structure of this sentence in details

My basic doubt is why WHICH cannot modify large concentrations in choice A as apostrophe modifies and which can modify a far of logical NOUN

SOURCE OG verbal review
Last edited by arghya05 on Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by HSPA » Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:26 am
Could you kindly underline???
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:32 am
Hi Arghya,

I am not sure what you mean by apostrophe modifier.

Anyhow, choice A is incorrect because of pronoun reference error. Look at the pronoun "there" and think about what it refers to. It should refer to "Baltic Sea". Now ask yourself, can "there" refer to "Baltic Sea". No it cannot. This is because "Baltic Sea" is not used as a noun. It is used as an adjective here.

Furthermore, the reference of "which" modifier is ambiguous. Yes it can refer to "large concentrations". But at the same time, it can also refer to "Baltic Sea sediments", the closest noun. Thus, the modifier reference is not very clear. Because of this apparent ambiguity, this choice is incorrect.

Thanks,
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:35 am
e-GMAT wrote: I am not sure what you mean by apostrophe modifier.
Thanks,
Hi,
I guess he meant to say appositive modifier.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by e-GMAT » Thu Jun 23, 2011 11:14 am
Thanks @Frankenstein for clarifying this.

Well in my opinion, the modifier - findings consistent with...- modifies the preceding clause.
Such modifiers (Noun + Noun Modifiers) can either modify preceding clause or preceding noun. What it actually modifies depends on the context of the sentence. In this case this modifier modifies the preceding clause, implying that it provides some more information about scientists' observations. A way to verify this as shown:

Noun + noun modifier modifies the preceding clause if you can form two meaningful sentences in the following way.
1. Clause
2. This is (or these are) noun + noun modifier (where this refers to the clause)

Applying this framework to this sentence:
1: Scientists have observed large concentration of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic sea sediments
2: These are findings consistent with the growth of industrial activity in the area.
The above two make complete sense.

Another example:
The sentence below is adapted from OG Verbal Review Purple Q#100 (with correct choice)
An asteroid bigger than Mount Everest slammed into North America, an event that caused the plant and animal extinctions that mark the end of the geologic era.

The noun + noun modifier in question are marked as shown.
1. An asteroid bigger than Mount Everest slammed into North America,
2. This was an event that caused the plant and animal extinctions that mark the end of the geologic era.
The above two sentences make complete sense.

For more details on this topic, you may view this link.
Join the discussion

by deep.amangmat » Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:25 pm
This is some good information @egmat. Thanks for sharing the link with us. I have lots of trouble with these appositives and absolute modifiers. I will try to use the "framework" that you have shown in those links and see if it helps.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1