BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

knewton Q

Expert replies
by bblast » Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:36 am
Solve : x/(x+4) > 5/3


x < -10

x > -4

-10 < x < -4

x > -4 or x < -10

x > -10

C
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by force5 » Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:33 pm
LHS has to be greater than 1.6

if x is greater greater than equal to -4 then x/x+4 will be less than 1.6 and if x is less than equal to -10 then too. i checked it with one value each,

hence -10<x<-4
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:49 pm
bblast wrote:Solve : x/(x+4) > 5/3


x < -10

x > -4

-10 < x < -4

x > -4 or x < -10

x > -10

C
The answer choices imply critical points at x=-10 and x=-4.
Test values to the left and right of these critical points.

Let x = -13:
-13/(-13 + 4) > 5/3
-13/-9 > 5/3
13/9 > 15/9.
Doesn't work.
Eliminate any answer choice that includes x=-13 in its range.
Eliminate A and D.

Let x=0:
0/(0+4) > 5/3.
0 > 5/3.
Doesn't work.
Eliminate any answer that includes x=0 in its range.
Eliminate B and E.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by wasim4gmat » Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:29 pm
Hi Mitch,

Can u pls advise my approach is incorrect

x/x+4>5/3
3x>5x+20
-2x>20
x>-10
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Aug 15, 2011 6:31 pm
wasim4gmat wrote:Hi Mitch,

Can u pls advise my approach is incorrect

x/x+4>5/3
3x>5x+20
-2x>20
x>-10
Not quite.
When we divide (or multiply) each side of an inequality by a negative value, we have to change the direction of the inequality.
In the problem above, we don't know whether the denominator (x+4) is positive or negative, so multiplying each side by (x+4) is risky.
One approach is to multiply each side by the SQUARE of the denominator, since the square of a value cannot be negative.
Here is an algebraic solution:

Multiply each side by 3:
x/(x+4) > 5/3
3x/(x+4) > 5.

Multiply each side by the square of the denominator: (x+4)².
Since (x+4)² cannot be negative, we don't have to worry about changing the direction of the inequality.
[3x/(x+4)] * (x+4)² > 5(x+4)²
3x(x+4) > 5(x² + 8x + 16)
3x² + 12x > 5x² + 40x + 80
0 > 2x² + 28x + 80
0 > x² + 14x + 40
0 > (x+4)(x+10).

The critical points are x=-4 and x=-10.
These are the only values that make the right hand side equal to 0.
When x is any other value, the right hand side will be less than or greater than 0.
To determine the range of x, test one value to the left and right of each critical point.

x < -10.
Plug x=-11 into 0 > (x+4)(x+10):
0 > (-11+4)(-11+10).
0 > (-7)(-1).
0 > 7.
Doesn't work.
x < -10 is not part of the range.

-10 < x < -4.
Plug x=-5 into 0 > (x+4)(x+10):
0 > (-5+4)(-5+10).
0 > (-1)(5).
0 > -5.
This works.
-10 < x < -4 is part of the range.

x > -4.
Plug x=0 into 0 > (x+4)(x+10):
0 > (0+4)(0+10).
0 > 40.
Doesn't work.
x > -4 is not part of the range.

Thus, -10 < x < -4.

Plugging in values and eliminating incorrect answer choices seems MUCH easier.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by nikhilgmat31 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:40 pm
Thanks for solving it Mitch. This is the great way of resolving the equation.

Multiply each side by the square of the denominator: (x+4)².
Since (x+4)² cannot be negative, we don't have to worry about changing the direction of the inequality.
[3x/(x+4)] * (x+4)² > 5(x+4)²
3x(x+4) > 5(x² + 8x + 16)
3x² + 12x > 5x² + 40x + 80
0 > 2x² + 28x + 80
0 > x² + 14x + 40
0 > (x+4)(x+10).



What is source of your learning. Which books do you study.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:52 am
Hi nikhilgmat31,

Since this series of posts is almost 4 years old, you probably won't be hearing back from many of the participants (except for Mitch).

Your approach to dealing with this question is clever, but you didn't actually answer the question (and you still haven't selected an answer). What would you do NEXT after your last step?

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by nikhilgmat31 » Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:31 pm
(x+4)(x+10) <0
Case 1
x+4 < 0 or x+10 > 0

x <-4 or x >10

Case 2
x+4 > 0 or x+10 < 0

x >-4 or x < -10


Next we can try substituting values in expression to see the condition.

x/(x+4) > 5/3

x = -11,9,10
Join the discussion