Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

where to use "had had" ?

Expert replies
by hemant_rajput » Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:06 am
can someone guide me on the usage of "had had"?
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Unlimitedgmat » Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:11 pm
This is a past perfect and is used to clarify the order of past events.

The following is correct:

James had had his hair cut when John walked in.

This means that the haircut took place prior to John entering.

Alex had had four glasses of wine when he was ejected from the bar

Again we know that the drinking took place prior to his being ejected.

If it said:

Alex had four glasses of wine when he was ejected from the bar.

this means that he was in possession of the four glasses when/as he was being ejected, which is a totally different meaning.

I hope those examples help.
Mo Bazazi
Founder - Unlimited GMAT
----------
Visit www.unlimitedgmat.com for free sample tests and resources.

[email protected]

If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
Join the discussion

by hemant_rajput » Sun Mar 31, 2013 12:47 am
@unlimitedgmat, can you please explain what is the difference b/w below 2 sentences:

he had had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves.

he had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion

by Ankur87 » Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:35 am
hemant_rajput wrote:@unlimitedgmat, can you please explain what is the difference b/w below 2 sentences:

he had had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves.

he had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves
Hi Hemant,
In the above case:
2nd option is correct because if this is the only sentence then we will use only one had.
If we are appending other sentence which occurred after "he had success" then we will use had had to show that the above event occurred first.
Join the discussion

by hemant_rajput » Sun Mar 31, 2013 2:35 am
1.Though he had had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves, Howard Stern opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium.

2.Though he had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves, Howard Stern opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium.

what is the difference in meaning of above 2 sentences?
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion

by Ankur87 » Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:10 am
hemant_rajput wrote:1.Though he had had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves, Howard Stern opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium.

2.Though he had success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves, Howard Stern opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium.

what is the difference in meaning of above 2 sentences?
2nd sentence here is wrong as it is not clear which one occurred first. He had success first and then he opted out or he opted out first and then he had success. To clear this doubt our 1st sentence is correct that is : "Though he had had success" which means he had success first and then he opted out.

The use of past perfect here is to show the timeline of two past events. Past perfect is used for the event that happened first - "success broadcasting his controversial radio program on highly regulated terrestrial airwaves". Simple Past is used for the event that happened after the first event - "opted out of terrestrial broadcasting in favor of the less regulated satellite radio medium"

so "Had Had" is necessary here to show the event occurred first.

let me know if you have any doubts regarding this.
Join the discussion

by Alina Ross » Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:50 am
Yes, it is appropriate to use "had had" and no, it's not redundant.

Have and its past tense and participle form had can have two equally valid uses -- as a main verb [as in "She had a bad headache earlier"] and as an auxiliary (also known as helping) verb [as in "She had given him more than enough chances already"], where the verb had is the "perfect" auxiliary verb to the main verb gave, seen in its participle form here, given.

Ok. Good. So what?

Well, it turns out that once in a great big while it is possible to use the main verb have simulataneously with the auxiliary verb have and to say something like "had had."

That is perfectly fine. Honest. Really. However, the reality is that many people think that such a construction is not euphonic (even though it is perfectly grammatical) and therefore avoid it.

Hope this helped you out. :)
Join the discussion