-
sumitkhurana
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:09 pm
- GMAT Score:710
Have a question:-
I read a rule somewhere that if a relative pronoun such as "which" "who" are preceded by a prepositional phrase which consists of 2 nouns, then the relative pronoun would modify the first noun of the prepositional phrase.
e.g. I borrowed the knife of Jim, who was my neighbour.
Here as per this source 'who' modifies knife, in the prepositional phrase kinfe of Jim, and hence this sentence is incorrect.
But after a few pages I found a contradiction in this sentence :-
I want to gain experience in finance, which is lacking in my current job.
Now here too "experience in finance" is a prepostional phrase linking 2 nouns. But as per the source "which" is modifying finance here, and hence this sentence is incorrect.
Now this logic appears to contradict the earlier theory.
Would appreciate if you clarify this for me.
I read a rule somewhere that if a relative pronoun such as "which" "who" are preceded by a prepositional phrase which consists of 2 nouns, then the relative pronoun would modify the first noun of the prepositional phrase.
e.g. I borrowed the knife of Jim, who was my neighbour.
Here as per this source 'who' modifies knife, in the prepositional phrase kinfe of Jim, and hence this sentence is incorrect.
But after a few pages I found a contradiction in this sentence :-
I want to gain experience in finance, which is lacking in my current job.
Now here too "experience in finance" is a prepostional phrase linking 2 nouns. But as per the source "which" is modifying finance here, and hence this sentence is incorrect.
Now this logic appears to contradict the earlier theory.
Would appreciate if you clarify this for me.

















