BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

When a subscriber of one telecom operator calls another subs

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:05 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

When a subscriber of one telecom operator calls another subscriber of different telecom operator, the destination telecom company (of the receiving subscriber) charges a small connection fee to the originating telecom operator. In Country Y, this connection fee, which is charged on a per minute basis, is stipulated by the regulator and thus, is same for every telecom operator.

Recently, in country Y, several new telecom operators have entered the market and almost all of them are enticing customers by charging much lower call rates than are charged by the existing operators. Since connection fee is one of the sources of revenue for new companies, the regulator should increase the connection fee so that the financials of the new telecom operators improve and thereby, they are able to better compete in the market.

1.Select a statement below which provides the strongest reason to suggest that the recommendation of the author would have the opposite effect than as envisaged.
A. The connection fee is such a small component of revenues of any telecom companies that no company could survive by just relying on this.
B. In the past, whenever regulator has been advised a course of action by an outside agency, the regulator has taken a completely opposite action step.
C. The financial health of a telecom company is determined by the total profits generated by the company, irrespective of the source of revenues.
D. Due to highly competitive call rates, the number of outgoing calls from an average user of a new telecom company is expected to be much greater than the number of incoming calls.
E. Increase in the connection fee may be passed on by the companies to the end users, which may make consumers switch their existing telecom company.

OA D

Source: e-GMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:02 am
OPTION A:- INCORRECT
This implies that the connection fee is not very much needed if is a small component of the revenue and cannot serve as a means to which the opposite of the authors recommendations will be fulfilled, because its main importance has been defeated.
The argument focuses more on the connection fee as the main source of revenue but this option opposes this fact and if the connection fees is reduce according to the authors recommendation, the finance of the telecommunication company have a higher chance of increasing otherwise.

OPTION B:- INCORRECT
The fact that it happened that way in the past doesn't have much influence in the current situation and doesn't serve as a means to which the opposite of the authors recommendation will be fulfilled.

OPTION C:- INCORRECT
This implies that special attention won't be given to connection fee as a source of revenue for the company as well as shows the relevance of the argument.

OPTION D:- CORRECT
If the author's recommendation is put to work and the connection fee is increased, the number of outgoing calls of a new telecom user is expected to be greater than the incoming calls to improve their finance because if it proves otherwise it means that there will be no improvement in their finance as well as no competition in the telecommunication market which happens to be the the opposite of the author's recommendation.

OPTION E:- INCORRECT
This doesn't serve as a reason for the opposite of the author's recommendation because the increment in the connection fee will help to improve finance.
Join the discussion

by deloitte247 » Sat Mar 16, 2019 12:02 am
OPTION A:- INCORRECT
This implies that the connection fee is not very much needed if is a small component of the revenue and cannot serve as a means to which the opposite of the authors recommendations will be fulfilled, because its main importance has been defeated.
The argument focuses more on the connection fee as the main source of revenue but this option opposes this fact and if the connection fees is reduce according to the authors recommendation, the finance of the telecommunication company have a higher chance of increasing otherwise.

OPTION B:- INCORRECT
The fact that it happened that way in the past doesn't have much influence in the current situation and doesn't serve as a means to which the opposite of the authors recommendation will be fulfilled.

OPTION C:- INCORRECT
This implies that special attention won't be given to connection fee as a source of revenue for the company as well as shows the relevance of the argument.

OPTION D:- CORRECT
If the author's recommendation is put to work and the connection fee is increased, the number of outgoing calls of a new telecom user is expected to be greater than the incoming calls to improve their finance because if it proves otherwise it means that there will be no improvement in their finance as well as no competition in the telecommunication market which happens to be the the opposite of the author's recommendation.

OPTION E:- INCORRECT
This doesn't serve as a reason for the opposite of the author's recommendation because the increment in the connection fee will help to improve finance.
Join the discussion