BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

what a DS question means vs. what it is

Expert replies
by goncaljj » Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:10 am
Question 154 of DS practice section from the “Official” GMAT review book (2008 version):

Stem: Is x negative?
Data:

a) x^3(1-x^2)<0
b) x^2-1<0

Based on a) -1<x<0 U x>1
Based on b) -1<x<1

Neither option is sufficient on their own; now, if we intersect both a) and b), the answer is -1<x<0. The “official” answer to this question is that C (both options combined) are sufficient to determine whether the number x is negative, HOWEVER, it is not any negative, since, for example, x = -8 does not satisfy either a) or b), and it is still negative number; so, to me this is an option E. Of course, I got it wrong, since what the GMAT guys meant to ask seems not to be what they actually asked... Or am I a too complicated thinker? I bet that two questions like this in the same exam would have different answers depending upon whomever decided what the one they wanted was.

Any comments are appreciated.

:cry:
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ed09 » Fri Sep 19, 2008 4:58 pm
Hi Goncaljj,

Let's try to think together.

First, I suppose we both agree that (-1<x<0) is the solution of the system of the inequalities given, or that x belongs to the interval of (-1;0) on a number line. Certainly, numbers on this line are real on default.

Now let’s look at our terse stem. It unceremoniously asks "Is x negative?". In other words, does x belongs to the interval of (-inf.;0) on a number line?

So, we have the interval of (-1;0) for all values of our troublesome x, and the interval of (-inf.;0) for all negatives.

On this understanding, our question is whether our interval of (-1;0) belongs to the interval of (-inf.;0) on a number line.

Evidently (at least to me), the interval of (-1;0) is a snip of the interval of (-inf.;0) and therefore (-1;0), indeed, belongs to (-inf.;0).

Actually, that means that our tiresome x belongs to negatives. Of course, it does not mean that x embraces all negative values, but, nonetheless, it is ALWAYS negative, and this is enough (read as SUFFICIENT) for us to say “YES!” on this ...(find here adjective you like) question.

It seems that’s it.

I’ll appreciate your objections or pointing to any, even tiny, flaws in my logic.

What a sobbing face in the bottom! Get rid of it!
Be fresh and cheerful! :)

Best!
Join the discussion

goncaljj wrote:
the answer is -1<x<0. The “official” answer to this question is that C (both options combined) are sufficient to determine whether the number x is negative, HOWEVER, it is not any negative, since, for example, x = -8 does not satisfy either a) or b), and it is still negative number; so, to me this is an option E. Of course, I got it wrong, since what the GMAT guys meant to ask seems not to be what they actually asked... Or am I a too complicated thinker? I bet that two questions like this in the same exam would have different answers depending upon whomever decided what the one they wanted was.
ed09 has given a great explanation above, but I just wanted to add a few words. If I ask "Is -3 negative?" I expect it's obvious that the answer is 'yes'. It doesn't matter that -3 cannot be equal to -8. Similarly, if you know that x lies between -1 and 0, you can be absolutely certain that x is negative. Again, it doesn't matter that x cannot be equal to -8.

The answers to GMAT Quant questions are never at the whim of the question designer. If you can determine that -1 < x < 0 on a GMAT DS question that asks 'is x negative?', then you certainly have sufficient information.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion