• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## Well known city tagged by: ##### This topic has 1 expert reply and 2 member replies ## Well known city Book Review: When I read a novel set in a city I know well, I must see that the writer knows the city as well as I do if I am to take that writer seriously. If the writer is faking I know immediately and do not trust the writer. When a novelist demonstrates the required knowledge, I trust the story teller, so I trust the tale. This trust increases my enjoyment of a good novel. Peter Lee's second novel is set in San Francisco, in this novel, as in his first, Lee passes my test with flying colours. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage? (A) The book reviewer enjoys virtually any novel written by a novelist whom she trusts (B) If the book reviewer trusts the novelist as a storyteller, the novel in question must be set in a city the book reviewer knows well (C) Peter Lee's first novel was set in San Francisco (D) The book reviewer does not trust any novel set in a city that she does not know well (E) The book reviewer does not believe that she knows San Francisco better than Peter Lee does OA after some discussion. Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 06 Oct 2008 Posted: 207 messages Followed by: 3 members Upvotes: 5 The answer should be E. The author of this passage will only trust someone when that guy knows the place same as author or better then author. E says that Peter Lee knows San Francisco better than author. So E. _________________ Thanks and Regards, Varun https://mbayogi.wordpress.com/ Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 27 Jul 2010 Posted: 55 messages Upvotes: 11 Target GMAT Score: 700 I agree with E. B and D look like trap answers because they make it seem like the reviewer must have knowledge of the city to be able to prove that the author does, too (and therefore trust the author). But all we really know is that if the reviewer does know the city and feels that the author doesn't, she won't trust the author. We aren't given any information about what would happen if the reader doesn't know the city, so we can't infer B or D. E we can prove. The novel passes the test, which means that the reviewer believes that Lee truly does know San Francisco at least as well as she does. ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 03 Jul 2008 Posted: 1031 messages Followed by: 253 members Upvotes: 716 GMAT Score: 750 Nicely done, guys! This is a terrific example of an inference question - those on which you are asked to supply the conclusion. On these questions, the conclusion "Must be True" based on the facts - and the GMAT is terrific at twisting the logic in trap answers to make sure that you're paying attention. Here we know that: If the reader feels that she knows the city better than the author, she loses trust and If she loses trust, she does not enjoy the book We also know that: She did enjoy Lee's second novel based on that, we can conclude that, because she enjoyed the book, she did not lose trust in the author, and therefore she did not feel that the author had lesser knowledge of SF than she does. Now, there are some definite trap answers here. As Karl mentioned, we don't know what happens if the reader does not know the city well - there's no basis for her to lose any trust. So choice B, although it seems somewhat likely, is not necessarily true. Say that a book takes place in Lisbon, and the reader has never been to Lisbon. How could she lose trust even if the author is taking liberties with the geography? The author may not know the city well, but if the reader doesn't know the city well enough to know, we cannot conclude that she'd lose that trust. Similarly for D, the reader only has to know that the author's knowledge of a city is at least as good as hers - if a story takes place in Lisbon and the reader doesn't know the city, she won't necessarily lose trust because she has no basis for being able to distrust the author. This question is a great example of If...Then logic. When we have a cause and effect relationship like: If it rains, we will cancel the game. We ONLY know what happens if it rains. We cannot draw any conclusions about what will happen if it does not rain - it's not safe to say that "if it doesn't rain, we will play". Other circumstances could intervene, as well -a volcano, a swarm of locusts... The ONLY two things we know in this case deal with the specific cause we're dealt: If it rains, we cancel If we did not cancel, it did not rain The second is something we can directly infer from the given information. If we know that rain will definitely prompt a cancellation, then the lack of a cancellation violates the "if" term...it must not have rained. _________________ Brian Galvin GMAT Instructor Director of Academic Programs Veritas Prep Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More. Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now! • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 1 Hour Free BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5 Day FREE Trial Study Smarter, Not Harder Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • FREE GMAT Exam Know how you'd score today for$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Ian Stewart 43 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 35 first replies
3 Scott@TargetTestPrep 33 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 28 first replies
5 GMATGuruNY 19 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

149 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

93 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

53 posts
4 Ian Stewart

GMATiX Teacher

52 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

32 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts