BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Wekening - Govt. Plan

Expert replies
by Gmat09_5ALL » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:28 pm
6.20
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government's plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by delhiboy1979 » Thu Oct 01, 2009 12:15 am
I think it should be D.

D implies that there is no additional savings. THe citizens already had the money in the savings and habve onnly been moving them across accounts. So logically, there is no extra savings.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:39 am
Pls, help, why A is wrong
Join the discussion

by asamaverick » Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:20 am
IMO A is wrong because -

The government's objective was to increase the money in savings and from the concluding line it is clear that a lot of money did go into this special savings account.

As per 'A', substantial number of people withdrew at least some money. This in no way indicates that people did not start saving because of the government initiative. Hence it is not enough to state (based on A) that government failed in its objective.
Join the discussion

why A is wrong, very hard CR

by tanviet » Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:53 am
I still do not understand why A is wrong. pls help
Join the discussion

by srivas » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:28 am
Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working

In option D people are trasforing money from the exisiting accounts to the special accounts.
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

Re: Wekening - Govt. Plan

by Jatinder » Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:53 am
Gmat09_5ALL wrote:6.20
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government's plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.
What is the source of the question Gmat09?
Keep flying
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:58 am
Should be D
Join the discussion

by JeffB » Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:11 pm
D strengthens the argument, does not weaken it.
Join the discussion

by nawabkhan83 » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:21 am
JeffB wrote:D strengthens the argument, does not weaken it.
I think it should be either C or D.
D looks a good option
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:20 am
Pls, help explain, why A is wrong
Join the discussion

by LifetimesofSC » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:51 am
I fell for the trap but I see it now...and obviously its too late.

1.) Govt wants citizens to increase the $ they put into savings.

2.) A is tricky as it states 'substantial', however D states that citizens have been transferring money from 1 savings account to another, meaning they are not increasing their savings but only balancing/allocating it.

F*** the GMAC/ETS for creating this question
Join the discussion

Re: Wekening - Govt. Plan

by gmatmachoman » Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:26 pm
Gmat09_5ALL wrote:6.20
Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
B. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
C. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.
D. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
E. Many of the economists who now claim that the government's plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

Is it not B???
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:23 pm
Pls, explain why A is wrong. A said that a number of people take out money. this is weakening.

pls, help me out.
Join the discussion

pls,help me, why A is wrong, weakening

by tanviet » Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:42 pm
pls, help me why A is wrong
Join the discussion