BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

weakens the conclusion

Expert replies
by thephoenix » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:07 am
Opponents of drug laws that forbid using marijuana argue that in a free country, people have the right to take risks with their bodies as long as the people do not cause harm to befall others as a result of taking the risks. This principle leads them to conclude that each person should have the right to decide for him or herself whether to use marijuana.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?

The rate of overdose fatalities in countries that do not have drug laws that forbid using marijuana is greater than the rate of fatalities in countries that do have such laws.

Unlike cocaine or heroin, there is little evidence, if any, that marijuana is addictive.

A greater percentage of fatal car accidents are caused by marijuana users than by alcohol users.

There is no evidence to suggest that people suffer medical maladies as a result of second-hand marijuana smoke.

Health insurance rates for all people are higher because of the need to pay for the increased medical care users of marijuana require.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatmachoman » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:14 am
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:22 am
The answer is E.The conclusion of the argument is that each person should have the right to decide for him or herself whether to use marijuana.The basis of this conclusion which is the assumption is that people have the right to take risks with their bodies as long as the people do not cause harm to befall others as a result of taking the risks.
Option E states that it affects the other people indirectly since Health insurance rates for all people are higher because of the need to pay for the increased medical care users of marijuana require.
Thus the conclusion is weakened.
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:33 am
gmatmachoman wrote:IMO C
C is wrong because it is tagential to the argument but does not weaken the argument. By introducing alcohol, it brings in something that was not in the stiumulus. This answer would have weakened the conclusion if the conclusion dealt with why marijuana should be legal as long as alcohol is legal.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Join the discussion

by harshavardhanc » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:33 pm
The Conclusion is based on :
......do not cause harm to befall others as a result of taking the risks. ........
and if :


Health insurance rates for all people are higher because of the need to pay for the increased medical care users of marijuana require.

the foundation on which the conclusion rests gets a hit !

hence, this option weakens the conclusion.
Regards,
Harsha
Join the discussion