sohrabkalra wrote:The mayor's advisers are attempting to alter the widespread public belief that the mayor's restructuring of the city's taxation system is to blame for the poor business climate in the city. They say that the poor business climate is part of a national phenomenon and that the mayor is only blamed because of a coincidence in time: the business climate happened to get worse shortly following the tax restructuring.

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the adviser's claim about the reason that the tax restructuring is blamed for the poor business climate?

A)There was a noticeable deterioration of the city's public transportation system immediately following the tax restructuring but the public drew no connection between the two events.

B)When the mayor was elected, by a sizeable majority, he had clearly enunciated his intention to restructure the city's taxation system.

C)Most economists agree that the effects of the tax restructuring on the city's business environment would not be immediately obvious, but would take at least a year to make themselves felt.

D)Despite the nationwide poor business environment, similar tax restructuring is being planned in cities of similar size throughout the country.

E)While the public generally objects to anything perceived to be likely to increase their taxes, they are just as quick to object to any reduction in the services supported by tax revenues

OA after some discussion !

First determine what is the mayor's claim as to why his tax plan is blamed.

His claim is that it is being blamed because of coincidence with a nationwide downturn

Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the adviser's claim about the reason that the tax restructuring is blamed for the poor business climate?