BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

We love the numbers line!

Expert replies
by mjjking » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:55 pm
Answer is C

thanks folks!
Attachments
number line.JPG
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by NethraN » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:55 am
I go with C.
Nethra
Join the discussion

by mjjking » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:50 am
I go with C too, but why? :shock:
Beat The GMAT - 1st priority
Enter a top MBA program - 2nd priority
Loving my wife: MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL!

REAL THING 1 (AUG 2007): 680 (Q43, V40)
REAL THING 2 (APR 2009): 720 (Q47, V41)
Join the discussion

by NethraN » Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:32 am
Because with stmt 1 alone is not sufficient and stmt 2 alone would be sufficient if it is mentioned that 'S' is positive but since this is not stated explicitly 'S' and be -ve and if its -ve 0 wont lie between r and s.

Now since stmt 1 says 'S' is positive we can derive the result from stmt 2.

So, both stmts together are sufficient.

Correct me if I am wrong.
Nethra
Join the discussion

by rs2010 » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:26 am
Yes combining both will information that

-s and r are same point on the number line so C.
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:04 pm
C
Here is my approach

The problem can be rewritten as

Is s = -r ?

Stmt 1 is not sufficient.

Stmt 2 can be written as t -r = t - (-s) OR r -t = t -(-s)
simplifying s = -r. OR r -t = t + s.

Using both stmts, we get s = -r. So C
Join the discussion