BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Please explain

Expert replies
by navdeepbajwa » Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:02 am
I read this sentence in GMAT prep how is this sentence correct here which should refer to Business( according MGMAT SC) but it is refering to equipment which does not make any sense.

David had been a great tennis champion in his youth, but decided to change professions in adulthood and began a small business selling tennis
equipment, which, to this day, he still runs.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by xcusemeplz2009 » Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:26 am
HI NAVDEEP
CAN U PLS POST THE FULL Q

AS I AM NOT ABLE TO GET YOUR DOUBT
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

re

by navdeepbajwa » Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:30 am
I donot remember the source now but it was in critical reasoning and not SC what i want to emphasize is that according to Manhattan SC which should refer to noun preceding which
Join the discussion

Re: re

by xcusemeplz2009 » Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:41 am
navdeepbajwa wrote:I donot remember the source now but it was in critical reasoning and not SC what i want to emphasize is that according to Manhattan SC which should refer to noun preceding which
ok i got your doubt well its better you check this link

it conludes that which refers to eligible or main noun ....
https://www.beatthegmat.com/which-usage-t42599.html

https://www.beatthegmat.com/correct-use- ... 46727.html
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by capnx » Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:12 am
don't study grammar/sc rules based on critical reasoning or reading comprehension material. I remember reading replies from one of the instructors (I think Stacey) stating that sentences from CR and RC do not necessarily follow the same rules which are tested in SC.

So you can actually see a sentence from RC or CR that would be wrong under the SC criteria.
Join the discussion

re

by navdeepbajwa » Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:51 pm
thanks
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1