As we know that when 'which' is used after comma, it should modify immediately preceding noun. Here are two examples from OG:
Ron's letters to Mary, which were written over a period of beginning a few years before Susan's marriage and ending to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.
Because of plunging prices for computer chips, which is due to an oversupply, the manufacturer has announced that it will cut production.
Is use of which correct here?
Correct use of which
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
Last edited by vaibhav.iit2002 on Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: O-Town FL
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:21 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
According to OG, first sentence is correct and second is wrong because -LifetimesofSC wrote:both incorrect
"because which refers to plural 'prices', it should be followed by are, not is" - hence 'which' is used correctly.
Plz help as this is a very big issue.
I have seen many times in Manhattan tests this concept and have learned that we can eliminate such options.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
Not an expert, but I will try to explain.vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:As we know that when 'which' is used after comma, it should modify immediately preceding noun. Here are two examples from OG:
Ron's letters to Mary, which were written over a period of beginning a few years before Susan's marriage and ending to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.
Because of plunging prices for computer chips, which is due to an oversupply, the manufacturer has announced that it will cut production.
Is use of which correct here?
Ron's LETTERS to Mary - Note that Letters is being modified by prep phrase 'to Mary'. Which correctly refers to the whole noun phrase 'Letters to Mary'. Same explanation holds good for second example. Which refers to noun phrase 'plunging prices for computer chips'
HTH
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
But I guess Manhattan says 'which' can modify preceding noun and not phrase.crackgmat007 wrote:Not an expert, but I will try to explain.vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:As we know that when 'which' is used after comma, it should modify immediately preceding noun. Here are two examples from OG:
Ron's letters to Mary, which were written over a period of beginning a few years before Susan's marriage and ending to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.
Because of plunging prices for computer chips, which is due to an oversupply, the manufacturer has announced that it will cut production.
Is use of which correct here?
Ron's LETTERS to Mary - Note that Letters is being modified by prep phrase 'to Mary'. Which correctly refers to the whole noun phrase 'Letters to Mary'. Same explanation holds good for second example. Which refers to noun phrase 'plunging prices for computer chips'
HTH
isn't that true?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
I saw in the guide that 'which' refers to noun but cannot refer to an entire clause. Also, applying the above rule learnt based on OG explanations (in some cases), I could weed out incorrect choices.vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:But I guess Manhattan says 'which' can modify preceding noun and not phrase.crackgmat007 wrote:Not an expert, but I will try to explain.vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:As we know that when 'which' is used after comma, it should modify immediately preceding noun. Here are two examples from OG:
Ron's letters to Mary, which were written over a period of beginning a few years before Susan's marriage and ending to Emily's brother and ending shortly before Emily's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.
Because of plunging prices for computer chips, which is due to an oversupply, the manufacturer has announced that it will cut production.
Is use of which correct here?
Ron's LETTERS to Mary - Note that Letters is being modified by prep phrase 'to Mary'. Which correctly refers to the whole noun phrase 'Letters to Mary'. Same explanation holds good for second example. Which refers to noun phrase 'plunging prices for computer chips'
HTH
isn't that true?
Can you pls tell me which page # in MGMAT SC guide? I want to make sure I dint miss anything
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
I found this concept in one og MGMAT CATS, not in guide.crackgmat007 wrote:
I saw in the guide that 'which' refers to noun but cannot refer to an entire clause. Also, applying the above rule learnt based on OG explanations (in some cases), I could weed out incorrect choices.
Can you pls tell me which page # in MGMAT SC guide? I want to make sure I dint miss anything
Do you mean that which can modify noun or phrase but not entire clause?
Plz tell me the page no. of Manhattan guide where you read this concept. I'll clear my doubt
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
Guide states noun but not to an entire clause. Although it doesnt explicitly rule out noun phrase, OG examples suggest so.vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:I found this concept in one og MGMAT CATS, not in guide.crackgmat007 wrote:
I saw in the guide that 'which' refers to noun but cannot refer to an entire clause. Also, applying the above rule learnt based on OG explanations (in some cases), I could weed out incorrect choices.
Can you pls tell me which page # in MGMAT SC guide? I want to make sure I dint miss anything
Do you mean that which can modify noun or phrase but not entire clause?
Plz tell me the page no. of Manhattan guide where you read this concept. I'll clear my doubt
Refer to Pg 109 - Chapter 6
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
Your explanation makes sensecrackgmat007 wrote:Guide states noun but not to an entire clause. Although it doesnt explicitly rule out noun phrase, OG examples suggest so.vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:I found this concept in one og MGMAT CATS, not in guide.crackgmat007 wrote:
I saw in the guide that 'which' refers to noun but cannot refer to an entire clause. Also, applying the above rule learnt based on OG explanations (in some cases), I could weed out incorrect choices.
Can you pls tell me which page # in MGMAT SC guide? I want to make sure I dint miss anything
Do you mean that which can modify noun or phrase but not entire clause?
Plz tell me the page no. of Manhattan guide where you read this concept. I'll clear my doubt
Refer to Pg 109 - Chapter 6
Will try this in future problems. Thanks
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
the gmat tends to write sentences in which "which" or "who" stands for the ELIGIBLE noun / noun phrase that's closest to the comma.
by "eligible", i mean that the noun has to
* AGREE IN TERMS OF SINGULAR/PLURAL with the FOLLOWING VERB
* AGREE IN TERMS OF PERSON/THING (i.e., no "which" for people, no "who" for things)
here's an example:
the box of nails, which is on the counter, is to be used on this project.
in this case, "which" CANNOT refer to "nails", since the verb "is" is singular. therefore, the nearest eligible noun is "box (of nails)". so, "which" unambiguously stands for that.
in our observation, the gmat has been VERY good about this.
whenever i've seen a "which"/"who" that refers to "X + preposition + Y" rather than just Y, it has ALWAYS been the case that X was singular and Y was plural (or X was plural and Y was singular), and the verb had a form that matched X and didn't match Y.
--
so, in your example:
Ron's letters to Mary, which were written...
in this example, "mary" is ineligible for two different reasons: mary is a person, not a thing (so "which" is wrong), and "mary" is singular (so "were" is wrong).
either of these makes "mary" ineligible to be the antecedent of "which".
so the antecedent is the noun phrase, "ron's letters to mary".
hope that helps.
by "eligible", i mean that the noun has to
* AGREE IN TERMS OF SINGULAR/PLURAL with the FOLLOWING VERB
* AGREE IN TERMS OF PERSON/THING (i.e., no "which" for people, no "who" for things)
here's an example:
the box of nails, which is on the counter, is to be used on this project.
in this case, "which" CANNOT refer to "nails", since the verb "is" is singular. therefore, the nearest eligible noun is "box (of nails)". so, "which" unambiguously stands for that.
in our observation, the gmat has been VERY good about this.
whenever i've seen a "which"/"who" that refers to "X + preposition + Y" rather than just Y, it has ALWAYS been the case that X was singular and Y was plural (or X was plural and Y was singular), and the verb had a form that matched X and didn't match Y.
--
so, in your example:
Ron's letters to Mary, which were written...
in this example, "mary" is ineligible for two different reasons: mary is a person, not a thing (so "which" is wrong), and "mary" is singular (so "were" is wrong).
either of these makes "mary" ineligible to be the antecedent of "which".
so the antecedent is the noun phrase, "ron's letters to mary".
hope that helps.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- GMAT Score:690
Thanks a lot Ron.lunarpower wrote:the gmat tends to write sentences in which "which" or "who" stands for the ELIGIBLE noun / noun phrase that's closest to the comma.
by "eligible", i mean that the noun has to
* AGREE IN TERMS OF SINGULAR/PLURAL with the FOLLOWING VERB
* AGREE IN TERMS OF PERSON/THING (i.e., no "which" for people, no "who" for things)
here's an example:
the box of nails, which is on the counter, is to be used on this project.
in this case, "which" CANNOT refer to "nails", since the verb "is" is singular. therefore, the nearest eligible noun is "box (of nails)". so, "which" unambiguously stands for that.
in our observation, the gmat has been VERY good about this.
whenever i've seen a "which"/"who" that refers to "X + preposition + Y" rather than just Y, it has ALWAYS been the case that X was singular and Y was plural (or X was plural and Y was singular), and the verb had a form that matched X and didn't match Y.
--
so, in your example:
Ron's letters to Mary, which were written...
in this example, "mary" is ineligible for two different reasons: mary is a person, not a thing (so "which" is wrong), and "mary" is singular (so "were" is wrong).
either of these makes "mary" ineligible to be the antecedent of "which".
so the antecedent is the noun phrase, "ron's letters to mary".
hope that helps.
It makes 101% sense.
Ron, do the rules for which/who are also valid for 'that'? If not plz provide the rule for use of 'that'
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
you have more leeway with "that". (also remember that there are tons of different uses of "that"; i'm talking about the use of "that" as a relative pronoun, in a role analogous to "which" but without a comma.)Ron, do the rules for which/who are also valid for 'that'? If not plz provide the rule for use of 'that'
"that" is usually used in a way similar to the way "which" is used, but there's more of a tolerance for inserting intervening constructions, such as small clauses, between the noun and "that".
for instance, there have been official problems to which the correct answers have been built like the following: (these are not the actual problems - i can't reproduce those - but they are built the same way)
* a chemical has been discovered that will revolutionize the petroleum-processing industry.
* the chemists have discovered a way of processing crude oil into useful petroleum extracts that has the potential to revolutionize the industry.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron