Tricky Parallelism

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:58 am

Tricky Parallelism

by tarina » Sun May 02, 2010 10:10 pm
1. Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.
A movies-less than those
B movies-fewer than have been
C movies, which is less than those
D movies, a number lower than the people
E movies, fewer than the ones

OA E
Anyway, I'm gonna talk about the "have been" in option B. See another one,

2. A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.

A claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

B claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought
C claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
D claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
E claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts

OA A
Slightly different from Option C in term "have been".

Is such parallelism wrong?
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:06 am
Location: India
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:580

by beat_gmat_09 » Sun May 02, 2010 10:32 pm
tarina wrote:1. Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies-less than those killed by bee stings.
A movies-less than those
B movies-fewer than have been
C movies, which is less than those
D movies, a number lower than the people
E movies, fewer than the ones

OA E
Anyway, I'm gonna talk about the "have been" in option B. See another one,

2. A surge in new home sales and a drop in weekly unemployment claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought.

A claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as some analysts previously thought

B claims suggests that the economy might not be so weak as some analysts have previously thought
C claims suggest that the economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought by some analysts
D claims, suggesting about the economy that it might not be so weak as previously thought by some analysts
E claims, suggesting the economy might not be as weak as previously thought to be by some analysts

OA A
Slightly different from Option C in term "have been".

Is such parallelism wrong?
I dont see any parallelism here (specif 2), parallel structures tested in GMAT are - either by listing series of things or comparing or contrasting dfferent things, generally nouns (position), verbs are words which are supposed to be parallel.
The second ques typically tests subject-verb-agree (option B), tenses (option C) modifier (option D and E)
only A is a good fit.

Do you have official explaintaion for parallelism ?

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 12:58 am

by tarina » Sun May 02, 2010 10:53 pm
beat_gmat_09 wrote:
I dont see any parallelism here (specif 2), parallel structures tested in GMAT are - either by listing series of things or comparing or contrasting dfferent things, generally nouns (position), verbs are words which are supposed to be parallel.
The second ques typically tests subject-verb-agree (option B), tenses (option C) modifier (option D and E)
only A is a good fit.

Do you have official explaintaion for parallelism ?
To correct that, they're comparison rather than parallelism.
If you compare A with B, A and B must be of one type, whether they're nouns or verbs.

Let's have a look at Q1:
In Option B, "have been" killed by bee stings is compared with "have been" killed by the shark.
Yet, in option D there's nothing to compare with" have been"
Q2:
In option C, economy might not be as weak as have been previously thought. Comparison between two verbs---"be" and "have been".

Have I made myself clear?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 437
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:06 am
Location: India
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:580

by beat_gmat_09 » Sun May 02, 2010 11:00 pm
I got your point of comparisons and their parallelisms,
i doubt that gmat tests them on helping verbs (be,have), have never seen so far.

• Page 1 of 1