Vitamin C

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Thanked: 3 times

Vitamin C

by drgmatIL » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:00 am
A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.


can someone explain to me why C is wrong?

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:09 am
imo:D

OA???

Legendary Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
Thanked: 13 times

by vivek.kapoor83 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:14 am
IMO D it shows that if low amount of Vitamins is taken, still flu can occur. So, If a massive dose is given flu didnt occur.So IMO D

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:42 am
Location: Mumbai

by rajasiddarth » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:42 am
To DRGMAT....


D is the right answer..

C is wrong because it says increasing dosage by 500% decreases the incidence of flu by 25%... so 25% of 34 is 8.5... so according to it 25.5% of ppl should have been affected... but only 9% are affected

Legendary Member
Posts: 1159
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:35 pm
Thanked: 56 times

by raunekk » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:16 am
C says..

Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.

language is strong..

thr is no surity given in d premises tat allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:08 am
Thanked: 2 times

by James_83 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:00 pm
Hmmmm...raunek..Tht makes sense...!!!

Gud one...!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 11:01 pm
Location: mumbai
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:640

by stubbornp » Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:07 am
imo D

Legendary Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:59 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by niraj_a » Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:51 am
E got me thinking for a while, and C seemed to strong of language.

Chose D in the end.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 3:55 am

by john83.amar » Thu May 12, 2016 11:42 am
I'm pretty confident that D is correct answer