BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

violating a person's right

Expert replies
by gmatnmein2010 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:29 am
The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?


1)An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.


2)A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.


3)An energy company's stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.


4)A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.


5)A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by thephoenix » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:35 am
gmatnmein2010 wrote:The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.

Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?


1)An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.


2)A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.


3)An energy company's stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.


4)A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.


5)A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
IMO E
because it contains all the relevant components of the argument: the employee brought to light information that encouraged honest government.

source pls
Join the discussion

by fibbonnaci » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:39 am
the stimulus talks about protection to govt representatives who reveal info in the interest of the public. following similiar lines,
1)An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government. [this is illegal. does not serve public interest. Eliminated!]


2)A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life. [from when did movie stars become govt employees? Eliminated!]


3)An energy company’s stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records. [this case does not deal with a govt office and what public interest is served is not clear. Eliminated!]


4)A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.[again not a govt employee. Eliminated!]


5)A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives. [correct! my answer. correctly addresses the stimulus. this is for sure in the interest of the public.]

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion