As fast as it was VS When it was

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

As fast as it was VS When it was

by rohangupta83 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:21 am
9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(C) twice what it was in
(D) two times faster than that of
(E) two times greater than
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:19 pm
Thanked: 27 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: As fast as it was VS When it was

by karmayogi » Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:35 am
rohangupta83 wrote:9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(C) twice what it was in
(D) two times faster than that of
(E) two times greater than
A comparing rate with year
B it is ambiguous.
C unnecessarily interrogative
D correctly comparing rate of ... in 1980 with 'that of the 1970's'.
E again comparing rate with year

Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
Thanked: 55 times
Followed by:1 members

Re: As fast as it was VS When it was

by iamcste » Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:09 am
rohangupta83 wrote:9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate

or, can we say when we say rate--as fast as or faster than becomes redundant..I mean when I say care runs at 30 miles/hour..I am trying to say how fast it runs ...so "as fast as" is redundant when we already have "rate of increase"

(B) twice as fast as it was in

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate

(C) twice what it was in

Avoids fast and greater than

Correct. Adverb "nearly" modifies adj twice

" what it " refers to the "rate of minority population of US" in that particular year

(D) two times faster than that of

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate

(E) two times greater than

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:03 am
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:730

by Carloblacksun » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:30 am
I would say C because the subject is not the INCREASE, but THE RATE of increase...a rate cannot be greater or faster, but simply be "twice" or "half"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 4:34 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Thanked: 9 times

by Tryingmybest » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:55 am
To me its C.

The way I look at it is in Choices other than C all have a word which is redundant to " increase" ie faster or greater

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: As fast as it was VS When it was

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:51 am
rohangupta83 wrote:9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(C) twice what it was in
(D) two times faster than that of
(E) two times greater than
rate of increase & fast redundant A,B and D are gone

between C and E

E is out because rate is compared to 1970's

Hence, C

It is not ambigious in C, rate of increase is our only bet for IT ( logically )
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

• Page 1 of 1