BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

query in set theory question

Expert replies
by manasgoswami1 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:30 am
Hi,

following is the question that i came across in veritas prep"

In the city of San Durango, 60 people own cats, dogs, or rabbits. If 30 people owned cats, 40 owned dogs, 10 owned rabbits, and 12 owned exactly two of the three types of pet, how many people owned all three?

a)2
b)4
c)8
d)12
e)32

The answer used the following logic:

Sum of totals in three individual categories - (sum of items in two categories) - (2 * number of items in all three categories) = Total

however what i know is that it should be

Sum of totals in three individual categories - (sum of items in two categories) - ( number of items in all three categories) = Total

as the formula is n(AuBuC)=n(A)+n(B)+n(C)+n (A common b common c)- [n(a common b)+n (b common c)n + n (c common a)]

am i right in my understanding or am i missing anything??
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:56 am
manasgoswami1 wrote: In the city of San Durango, 60 people own cats, dogs, or rabbits. If 30 people owned cats, 40 owned dogs, 10 owned rabbits, and 12 owned exactly two of the three types of pet, how many people owned all three?

a)2
b)4
c)8
d)12
e)32
The vast majority of problems with 3 overlapping groups are easily solved with the following formula:

T = A + B + C - (AB + AC + BC) - 2(ABC)

The big idea with overlapping group problems is to SUBTRACT THE OVERLAPS.
When we add together everyone in A, everyone in B, and everyone in C:
Those in exactly 2 of the groups (AB+AC+BC) are counted twice, so they need to be subtracted from the total ONCE.
Those in all 3 groups (ABC) are counted 3 times, so they need to be subtracted from the total TWICE.
By subtracting the overlaps, we ensure that no one is overcounted.

In the problem above:
T = 60
A = cat owners = 30.
B = dog owners = 40.
C = rabbit owners = 10.
The number who own exactly 2 of the 3 types of pet = AB + AC + BC = 12.
The number who own all 3 types of pet = ABC = x.

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:
60 = 30 + 40 + 10 - 12 - 2(x)
-8 = -2x
x=4.

The correct answer is B.

Other problems that can be solved with this formula:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/3-overlappin ... 49650.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-13-178-vi ... 11188.html
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by manasgoswami1 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:03 am
Hi Mitch,

there are conflicting theories. if you scroll down on https://webserver.ignou.ac.in/virtualcam ... IT%201.htm

then you see that multiplication by 2 is not there and the explanation too is given using venn diagrams.

Request your help in explaining this anomaly.

regards

Manas
Join the discussion

by manasgoswami1 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:07 am
correcting and reiterating my understanding

however what i know is that it should be

Sum of totals in three individual categories - (sum of items in two categories) + ( number of items in all three categories) = Total

as the formula is n(AuBuC)=n(A)+n(B)+n(C)+n (A common b common c)- [n(a common b)+n (b common c)n + n (c common a)]
Join the discussion


by GMATGuruNY » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:23 am
manasgoswami1 wrote:Hi Mitch,

there are conflicting theories. if you scroll down on https://webserver.ignou.ac.in/virtualcam ... IT%201.htm

then you see that multiplication by 2 is not there and the explanation too is given using venn diagrams.

Request your help in explaining this anomaly.

regards

Manas
Both formulas are correct, but they account for the overlaps differently.
I discuss the difference in my 2nd post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/sets-t148362.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by manasgoswami1 » Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:29 pm
Hi Mitch,

why are we dividing by 2 and why the answer is not 8?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 22, 2013 7:21 am
manasgoswami1 wrote:Hi Mitch,

why are we dividing by 2 and why the answer is not 8?
For 3 overlapping groups A, B and C, here are all of the different groupings:

Those in exactly ONE group:
Only A
Only B
Only C

Those in exactly TWO groups:
AB
AC
BC

Those in ALL THREE groups:
ABC

Here is the formula that I typically use:

T = A + B + C - (AB + AC + BC) - 2(ABC).

Let's examine the logic behind the formula.

The values in red represent EVERY element in A, EVERY element in B, and EVERY element in C.
Thus:
A = (Only A + AB + AC + ABC).
B = (Only B + AB + BC + ABC).
C = (Only C + AC + BC + ABC).
Adding together these values, we get:
T = A + B + C = (Only A + Only B + Only C) + (AB + AC + BC) + (AB + AC + BC) + (ABC + ABC + ABC).

Notice that the values in BLUE have been double-counted.
Thus, they must be subtracted from the total ONCE:
T = A + B + C - (AB + AC + BC).

Notice that the value in GREEN has been triple-counted.
Thus, it must be subtracted from the total TWICE:
T = A + B + C - (AB + AC + BC) - 2(ABC).

The result is the following formula:
T = A + B + C - (AB + AC + BC) - 2(ABC).

In the problem above:
T = 60.
A = cat owners = 30.
B = dog owners = 40.
C = rabbit owners = 10.
The number who own exactly 2 types of pet = AB + AC + BC = 12.
The number who own all 3 types of pet = ABC = x.

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:
60 = 30 + 40 + 10 - 12 - 2(x)
-8 = -2x
x=4.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:54 pm
manasgoswami1 wrote:
In the city of San Durango, 60 people own cats, dogs, or rabbits. If 30 people owned cats, 40 owned dogs, 10 owned rabbits, and 12 owned exactly two of the three types of pet, how many people owned all three?

a)2
b)4
c)8
d)12
e)32
We can use the following formula:

total pet owners = # who own dogs + # who own cats + # who own rabbits - # who own exactly two types - 2 x # who own three types + # who own none

Thus:

60 = 40 + 30 + 10 - 12 - 2T + 0

60 = 68 - 2T

2T = 8

T = 4

Answer: B

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion