past&future

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

past&future

by gmatmachoman » Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:53 am
In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these
occupations slipped in pay and status when women largely occupied them. Therefore, if
women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting,
law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.

The argument above is based on another argument that contains
A) circular reasoning
B) an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case
C) an analogy between the past and the future
D) an appeal to popular beliefs and values
E) an attack on the character of the opposition.

Which of the following, if true, would most likely be part of the evidence used to
refute the conclusion above?

A) Accountants, lawyers, and physicians attained their current relatively high
levels of income and prestige at about the same time that the pay and status of
teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries slipped.
B) When large numbers of men join a female-dominated occupation, such as
airline flight attendant, the status and pay of the occupation tend to increase.
C) The demand for teachers and secretaries has increased significantly in recent
years, while the demand for bank tellers has remained relatively stable.
D) If present trends in the awarding of law degrees to women continue, it will be
at least two decades before the majority of lawyers are women.
E) The pay and status of female accountants, lawyers, and physicians today are
governed by significantly different economic and sociological forces than
were the pay and status of female teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries in the
past.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:04 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:680

by sbasha » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:30 am
Answer for 1 - IMO C ( Check the wordings in the stem "The Past" and "will")

A) circular reasoning - No chicken/egg situation here
B) an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case - not refuting though
C) an analogy between the past and the future
D) an appeal to popular beliefs and values - author is not appealing
E) an attack on the character of the opposition. - definitely no no,

Answer for 2 -IMO E
Regards

Syed Basha

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 7:12 am
Location: Secaucus, New Jersey
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:700

by pradeepsarathy » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:40 am
1- IMO C

2 - IMO E
as well...

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:46 am
1.OA :C
2.OA :E

Cheers to the one who popped up right cookies!!!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:33 am

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 3:58 pm
Cannot decide between E and C. Can anyone brake down these two choices for me please