BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is xy > 0

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:52 am
(1)

x - y > -2

=> x > y - 2

Various values of x and y satisfy the above, some yielding xy as +ve, some as -ve.. Not sufficient

(2)

x - 2y < -6

=> 2y - 6 > x

Various values of x and y satisfy this, some yielding xy as +ve, some as -ve. Not Sufficient

Combining:

x - y > -2

=> x - 2y > -2 -y

From (2), we know

x - 2y < -6

Using both, we can say:

-2 -y < -6 => y >4 ( using the logic: b>a, b < c => c > a)

This in turn implies that x has to positive to satisfy x - y > -2 , thus xy will be positive

Hence (C)

Can you confirm the OA?
Join the discussion

by gmaterial » Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:29 pm
The OA is C.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Apr 07, 2012 1:01 am
One way to combine the two statements is to link together the inequalities. I posted an explanation here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/ds-inequalit ... 82218.html
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Shalabh's Quants » Sat Apr 07, 2012 5:51 am
Hi,

One way could be...

By Stat.1, x-y>-2 => by dividing both sides by -2. => x/-2-y/-2<1 => x/-2+ y/2<1,

If we plot above linear inequality in XY plane. Line passes through (-2,0) & (0,2) points. It means the line passes through 3 quadrants namely 1,2 & 3.

In quadrants 1; The co-ordinate of x & y will be both +ive.
In quadrants 2; The co-ordinate of x & y will be x -ive & y +ive.
In quadrants 3; The co-ordinate of x & y will be both -ive.

so, product of xy would be +ive in quadrants 1&3, or xy>1.
but,product of xy would be -ive in quadrants 2, or xy<1.

hence stat. 1 is insufficient.

Taking stat. 2...

x - 2y < -6
=> by dividing both sides by -6. => x/-6-2y/-6>1
or, x/-6+y/3>1

If we plot above linear inequality in XY plane. Line passes through (-6,0) & (0,3) points. It means this line too passes through 3 quadrants namely 1,2 & 3.

In quadrants 1; The co-ordinate of x & y will be both +ive.
In quadrants 2; The co-ordinate of x & y will be x -ive & y +ive.
In quadrants 3; The co-ordinate of x & y will be both -ive.

so, product of xy would be +ive in quadrants 1&3, or xy>1.
but,product of xy would be -ive in quadrants 2, or xy<1.

hence stat. 2 is insufficient.

Combining both statements... Simply solve 2 inequalities treating them as linear equation.

x-y>-2 & x-2y<-6;

=> x-y>-2
-x+2y>6;(Changing the sign of inequality)

Which yields y>4 & x>2. or xy>1.

hence stat. 1 & 2 together are sufficient.
Shalabh Jain,
e-GMAT Instructor
Join the discussion

by pims » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:48 am
Rich ?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:04 am
GMAT Hacker wrote:Is xy > 0 ?

(1) x - y > -2

(2) x - 2y < -6

I will post the QA later.
Target question: Is xy > 0 ?

Statement 1: x - y > -2
There are several values of x and y that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 and y = 1, in which case xy > 0
Case b: x = 1 and y = -1, in which case xy < 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x - 2y < -6
There are several values of x and y that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x = -10 and y = -1, in which case xy > 0
Case b: x = -10 and y = 1, in which case xy < 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
NOTE: We can ADD inequalities if the inequality signs are facing the SAME DIRECTION.
Statement 1 says x - y > -2
Take statement 2 and multiply both sides by -1 to get: -x + 2y > 6
Now that the inequality signs are facing the SAME DIRECTION, add the inequalities to get:
y > 4
In other words, y is POSITIVE
Also, since y > 4 and x > y-2, we know that x > 2. In other words, x is POSITIVE
If x and y are both POSITIVE, then we can be certain that xy > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATinsight » Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:03 am
GMAT Hacker wrote:Is xy > 0 ?

(1) x - y > -2

(2) x - 2y < -6

I will post the QA later.
Question : Is XY > 0?
but if X and Y have same Sign then Answer to the question will be YES
and if X and Y have Different Sign then Answer to the question will be NO

Therefore we only have to find out whether their signs are same or not

Question Rephrased : Do X and Y have same Sign?

Statement 1) X-Y > -2
which can be true for X=2 and Y = -1 (X and Y different sign) and also if
which can be true for X=2 and Y = 1 (X and Y same sign)

Inconsistent Solution therefore INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2) X-2Y < -6
which can be true for X=-10 and Y = 1 (X and Y different sign) and also if
which can be true for X=2 and Y = 10 (X and Y same sign)

Inconsistent Solution therefore INSUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements
X-2Y < -6 i.e. -X+2Y >6
and
X-Y > -2

Adding the two equations we get
(-X+2Y)+(X-Y) > 6-2
i.e. Y > 4
i.e. Y is positive
from Statement 1
X-Y > -2
i.e. X > -2+(4)
i.e. X > 2
i.e. X is positive

Both are positive therefore

SUFFICIENT

Answer: Option C
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Jul 21, 2014 1:58 pm
Hi pims,

This is a rather "lean" DS question - it has no restrictions; it's just a question. Is XY > 0? This is a YES/NO question.

This is a great question for TESTing VALUES. In these situations, I love using the number 0 (if I'm not restricted from using it by something in the Facts). This question is also built around some Number Properties:

For XY to be greater than 0, then....
X and Y are BOTH positive OR BOTH negative (which gives us a YES answer)

ANY other combination (1 positive and 1 negative, anything and a 0) will give you an XY that is NOT greater than 0 (which gives us a NO answer).

Fact 1: X - Y > -2

Let's TEST VALUES
If....
X = 1, Y = 0, then the answer to the question is NO
X = 1, Y = 1, then the answer to the question is YES
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: X - 2Y < -6

Again, let's TEST VALUES
If...
X = -10, Y = 0, then the answer to the question is NO
X = -10, Y = -1, then the answer to the question is YES
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know...
X - Y > -2
X - 2Y < -6

From here, we can "do math" in a variety of ways. I'm going to rewrite the inequalities....

X > Y - 2
X < 2Y - 6

And then combine them...

2Y - 6 > X > Y - 2

We now know....

2Y - 6 > Y - 2

Simplify...

Y > 4

Plugging that information back into this inequality...

X > Y - 2

X > (>4) - 2

....means that X MUST be POSITIVE.

So, Y is POSITIVE and X is POSITIVE, so the answer to the question is always YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT.

Final Answer:C

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion