BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

laws of motion

Expert replies
by killerdrummer » Mon May 13, 2013 8:58 am
Holas!

Which one between the two is correct and why? ...............will post OA later :d


In laws of motion, there are a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion.

OR

In laws of motion, there is a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion
--------------------------------
Don't forget to hit the "Thank" button,if you find above information helpful. :)
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by hemant_rajput » Tue May 14, 2013 11:10 pm
killerdrummer wrote:Holas!

Which one between the two is correct and why? ...............will post OA later :d


In laws of motion, there are a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion.

OR

In laws of motion, there is a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion

IMO B. Condition and its converse , both terms are bind together as one, like bread and butter.

what actually is the source of this sentence? I've my doubts about the structure of the sentence.
I'm no expert, just trying to work on my skills. If I've made any mistakes please bear with me.
Join the discussion

by vivekchandrams » Wed May 15, 2013 4:57 am
Hey hemant_rajput,

I'm totally not satisfied with my answer, and I go with A. The reason why I chose it is that when there are 2 objects joined by an 'and' they tend to become plural. For eg., A and B are good friends. Here it preceeds the 2 objects in consideration - a condition, it's converse.

Please correct me if I am wrong
Join the discussion

by hutch27 » Wed May 15, 2013 1:09 pm
killerdrummer wrote:Holas!

Which one between the two is correct and why? ...............will post OA later :d


In laws of motion, there are a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion.

OR

In laws of motion, there is a condition and its converse regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion
noooo u cant have those original sentences cuz it doesnt make sense... wrong modifier. After a prepositional phrase u cant have there are. it just doesnt work.

this would probably be better from a grammatical standpoint at conveying the intended meaning

There is a condition and its converse, regarding bodies at rest and bodies in motion, in the laws of motion
Join the discussion

by killerdrummer » Thu May 16, 2013 9:38 pm
Well OA was A..

Frankly,I don't remember the source. I have been trying to find out the same but unable to... :(
--------------------------------
Don't forget to hit the "Thank" button,if you find above information helpful. :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1