BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAtprep question

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by niraj_a » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:02 pm
3 should be the answer

i solved this by drawing a simple diagram...
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:07 pm
How did get 3 for the answer? I drew a diagram also but my diagram shows more than 5 oranges being in the top row and that's not even one of the answer choices!!
Join the discussion

by beeparoo » Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:24 pm
mlane25269 wrote:How did get 3 for the answer? I drew a diagram also but my diagram shows more than 5 oranges being in the top row and that's not even one of the answer choices!!
@mlane: Hmmm... Let me pick your brain a bit. How many oranges did you have in your 2nd (middle) layer?

Sandra
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:10 pm
I came up with 8 oranges in the second row for my drawing
Join the discussion

by beeparoo » Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:17 am
mlane25269 wrote:I came up with 8 oranges in the second row for my drawing
OK - I had 8 oranges too and I still got the correct answer, which is 3 oranges on the 3rd layer (very top).

Assuming your 2nd layer looks like this rough sketch:
OOOO
OOOO

Then only 3 oranges can be stacked on top while satisfying the condition in the Question-Stem.

++
mlane25269 wrote:How did get 3 for the answer? I drew a diagram also but my diagram shows more than 5 oranges being in the top row and that's not even one of the answer choices!!
How did you manage to stack another 8 oranges on the top 3rd layer layer without breaking the condition?
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:32 am
ok I think I know what I did wrong now. I drew the second layer outside of my original drawing and came up with 3 oranges staced on top of the second row. Makes sense now. Thanks!
Join the discussion

by ksh » Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:19 pm
Hi,

the bottommost 3 rows will have 5*3=15 oranges
Second stack will have 4*2 =8 oranges and,
the topmost stack will have just 3*1=3 oranges.

Hope this makes a sense.
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:28 pm
ok that makes sense now! thanks!
Join the discussion