BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

the altitude on side

Expert replies
by sanju09 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:56 pm
In ∆PQR, D is a point on the side PR such that QD is the altitude on it. What is the measure of side QR?
I. The measure of side PQ is 4√2 and ∠QPR = 45°.
II. The measure of side DR in the ∆QDR is 3.

[spoiler]made up by Sanjeev K Saxena for Avenues Abroad[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by killer1387 » Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:05 am
sanju09 wrote:In ∆PQR, D is a point on the side PR such that QD is the altitude on it. What is the measure of side QR?
I. The measure of side PQ is 4√2 and ∠QPR = 45°.
II. The measure of side DR in the ∆QDR is 3.

[spoiler]made up by Sanjeev K Saxena for Avenues Abroad[/spoiler]
statement I:
we have the side PD=QD=4
But we dont have info for calculating QR

INSUFFICIENT

statement II:
DR = 3
WE CANT FIND ANYTHING ELSE WITH THIS INFO

INSUFFICIENT

I& II;

In right triangle QDR we have QD= 4; DR= 3
HENCE QR= sq rt (16+9)=5

SUFFICIENT

HENCE C.
Join the discussion

by klmehta03 » Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:17 pm
agree IMO C. OA pls?
Join the discussion

by bryan88 » Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:42 am
+1 for C
Join the discussion

by fyllmax » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:04 pm
killer1387 wrote:
sanju09 wrote:In ∆PQR, D is a point on the side PR such that QD is the altitude on it. What is the measure of side QR?
I. The measure of side PQ is 4√2 and ∠QPR = 45°.
II. The measure of side DR in the ∆QDR is 3.

[spoiler]made up by Sanjeev K Saxena for Avenues Abroad[/spoiler]
statement I:
we have the side PD=QD=4
But we dont have info for calculating QR

INSUFFICIENT

statement II:
DR = 3
WE CANT FIND ANYTHING ELSE WITH THIS INFO

INSUFFICIENT

I& II;

In right triangle QDR we have QD= 4; DR= 3
HENCE QR= sq rt (16+9)=5

SUFFICIENT

HENCE C.
How do u know that pd=qd=4? I don`t get this ?
Join the discussion

by neelgandham » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:54 pm
fyllmax,

Let me answer the question on killers behalf. Before you go through the explanation, can I request you to open the attachment and have a quick look.

Solution:
In right angled riangle QPD, we know that angle PDQ = 90 degrees and angle Angle QPD = 45 degrees.
As sum of angles of a triangle is equal to 180 degrees.
Angle QPD + Angle PDQ + Angle DQP = 180.
i.e. 45 + 90 + Angle DQP = 180
Angle DQP = 45 degrees

Now, we have a right angled triangle with two equal angles(45 degrees each). Since, the two angles in the right triangle are equal, the sides opposite to the angles must be equal. i.e. PD = QD

But from Pythagorean theorem,
In right angled triangle PDQ,
PD^2 + QD^2 = PQ^2, i.e.
2 * PD^2 = (4√2)^2 (PQ = 4√2 and QD = PD)
2 * PD^2 = 4^2 * 2
PD = 4
PD = QD = 4.

I hope that answers your question. Let me know if you need any further help
Attachments
BeattheGMAT.jpg
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Join the discussion

by bobdylan » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:38 am
And why isn't statement 1 sufficient by itself ??
Join the discussion

by bobdylan » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:39 am
And why isn't statement 1 sufficient by itself ??
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Sat Apr 21, 2012 12:59 am
bobdylan wrote:And why isn't statement 1 sufficient by itself ??

For the determination of a triangle, we must have any one of the following set of information known:

1. Its two sides and their included angle are known.

2. Its one side and angles at the endpoints of this side are known.

From statement (I), we can only determine ∆PQD, which cannot answer QR. We are able to answer QR only if we are able to determine either ∆PQR or ∆QDR, which cannot be done without knowing either ∠DQR or the measure of side DR of ∆QDR. Hence statement (I) alone is not sufficient.
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion