BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Integer Diff

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by pemdas » Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:24 am
find x-y, first
x>3 is x-3>0 and
y<10 is y-10<0 or -y+10>0 add them up
x-y>-7

then
x<6 is x-6<0 and
y>6 is y-6>0 or -y+6<0 add them up
x-y<0

so -7<x-y<0, since difference doesn't imply subtract y from x, but rather only difference, we have difference as 6 between 0 and 7.

d
karthikpandian19 wrote:If 3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer difference of x and y?

3
4
5
6
7
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 3:33 am
Oh....that's a new way of doing...thank you for that
pemdas wrote:find x-y, first
x>3 is x-3>0 and
y<10 is y-10<0 or -y+10>0 add them up
x-y>-7

then
x<6 is x-6<0 and
y>6 is y-6>0 or -y+6<0 add them up
x-y<0

so -7<x-y<0, since difference doesn't imply subtract y from x, but rather only difference, we have difference as 6 between 0 and 7.

d
karthikpandian19 wrote:If 3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer difference of x and y?

3
4
5
6
7
Join the discussion

by arpan20690 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 3:38 am
This question does not need to played with inequalities.
get the maximum difference between x and y. Y is greater than x.
Take x as less as possible. and y as large as possible.
let take x = 3.01 and y = 9.99
so, y-x = 6.98
We can not touch 7 as this will violate the given condition. So, maximum Possible
Integer Value is 6.
Introduction of BOX ([]) function would make this even more
simpler.
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Mon Dec 26, 2011 4:47 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:If 3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer difference of x and y?

3
4
5
6
7
not sure, that it is a good idea, but still if I have no time, I will think this way-

3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer

x can be between 3.01 and 5.99 (approx)

y can be between 6.01 and 9.99 (approx)


so ,the greatest positive INTEGER difference of y and x is 9.99-3.99=6
Join the discussion

by karthikpandian19 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 5:00 am
@pemdas

After seeing the explanations, this problem cannot be solved with Inequalities.

OA is 6
LalaB wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:If 3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer difference of x and y?

3
4
5
6
7
not sure, that it is a good idea, but still if I have no time, I will think this way-

3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer

x can be between 3.01 and 5.99 (approx)

y can be between 6.01 and 9.99 (approx)


so ,the greatest positive INTEGER difference of y and x is 9.99-3.99=6
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Mon Dec 26, 2011 7:56 am
2<a<3<b<4

this is similar question from Kaplan which asks to solve for (1/3)ab

care to solve this question by assessing min/max values for a and b?
I don't mean inequalities are must here, but they help clear the way
karthikpandian19 wrote:@pemdas

After seeing the explanations, this problem cannot be solved with Inequalities.

OA is 6
LalaB wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:If 3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer difference of x and y?

3
4
5
6
7
not sure, that it is a good idea, but still if I have no time, I will think this way-

3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer

x can be between 3.01 and 5.99 (approx)

y can be between 6.01 and 9.99 (approx)


so ,the greatest positive INTEGER difference of y and x is 9.99-3.99=6
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:08 am
@karthikpandian19
pemdas shows the conceptual way of problem solving

as I have mentioned my way is not perfect (in some cases it is even bad). my method is laid more on common sense, than on solid math knowledge.

pemdas wrote:2<a<3<b<4

this is similar question from Kaplan which asks to solve for (1/3)ab

care to solve this question by assessing min/max values for a and b?
I don't mean inequalities are must here, but they help clear the way
2<a<3
3<b<4
6<ab<12

2<1/3ab<4

using a calculator and my previous way of problem solving,we can find out whether the solution above is right.


@pemdas, is my answ ok?
Last edited by LalaB on Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:41 am
in general an answer found is correct, but the way two inequalities were multiplied was aberrant. Instead, i would separate the signs and put >0 or <0 to understand the sign of multiplier. Here, however all numbers are +ve and no error was captured.

assume a=2 and b=3 is the lower ceiling, then ab>6 and ab/3>2
assume a=3 and b=4 is the upper ceiling, then ab<12 and ab/3<4

2<ab/3<4
LalaB wrote:
pemdas wrote:2<a<3<b<4

this is similar question from Kaplan which asks to solve for (1/3)ab

care to solve this question by assessing min/max values for a and b?
I don't mean inequalities are must here, but they help clear the way
2<a<3
3<b<4
6<ab<12

2<1/3abd<4

using a calculator and my previous way of problem solving,we can find out whether the solution above is right.


@pemdas, is my answ ok?
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:46 am
pemdas wrote:in general an answer found is correct, but the way two inequalities were multiplied was aberrant. Instead, i would separate the signs and put >0 or <0 to understand the sign of multiplier. Here, however all numbers are +ve and no error was captured.

assume a=2 and b=3 is the lower ceiling, then ab>6 and ab/3>2
assume a=3 and b=4 is the upper ceiling, then ab<12 and ab/3<4

2<ab/3<4
hm, pemdas show me the difference with my approach )) i have done the same. multiplied one side of the inequity with the side of another inequity.
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:49 am
btw, if we are asked (b-a), then the answer will be -

2<a<3
3<b<4

3-3<b-a<4-2
0<b-a<2

i mean now we subtract opposite sides
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:44 am
multiplication operation with inequalities in this form isn't right
LalaB wrote:2<a<3
3<b<4
here all numbers are +ve, BUT in case the sign were different
-2<a<3
3<b<4
according to your method we would get -6<ab<12?

Nevertheless, 'a' could be -7/4 and 'b' could be 15/4, then ab=-105/16 which is less (and not greater) than -6 (namely, it's -6.56)
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:52 am
pemdas wrote:multiplication operation with inequalities in this form isn't right
LalaB wrote:2<a<3
3<b<4
here all numbers are +ve, BUT in case the sign were different
-2<a<3
3<b<4
according to your method we would get -6<ab<12?

Nevertheless, 'a' could be -7/4 and 'b' could be 15/4, then ab=-105/16 which is less (and not greater) than -6 (namely, it's -6.56)
good point :)
pemdas, let me exlain what I am trying to do.
to find the limits of two equaties I try to find the max and the min values.

-2<a<3
3<b<4

in this case the minimum value will be -2*4(I multiply min of one equity with max of another one) , the max - 3*3 (I multiply min of one equity with max of another one)
I mean i always try to minimize one side, and maximize another side

so i got

-8<ab<9
Join the discussion

by rijul007 » Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:08 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:If 3<x<6<y<10, then what is the greatest possible positive integer difference of x and y?

3
4
5
6
7
3<x<6<y<10

3 < x < 6
6 < y < 10

For smallest value of y-x, subtract largest value of x from smallest value of y
y-x = 6.000000.....1 - 5.99999.....9 = 0.0000000......2

For largestvalue of y-x, subtract smallest possible value of x from largest possible value of y
y-x = 9.99999.....9 - 3.000000........1 = 6.9999999999.......8

Integer value of y-x
0 < y-x < 7

Greatest possible positive integer = 6
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:14 am
why you restrict the RHS to 9? The point is a multiplication of inequalities containing more than one inequality sign may not be admissible. We have to test each inequality.
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion