BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Manhattan Gmat - Number properties - Integers

Expert replies
by FridaKräm » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:11 am
"In a sequence of 8 consecutive integers, how much greater is the sum of the last four integers than the sum of the last four integers?"

I solved this question by calculating the arithmetic mean for the two sets and then multipy them with the number of items in each set (4). Which means:
1->4 4 integers x arithmetic number: 2,5 = 10
5->8 4 integers x arithmetic number: 6,5 = 26

The difference is 26-10 = 16

Since the answer key suggests four different solutions and non is the one I used I wonder if "my" method can be applied on other questions like this one?

Thanks!
Frida
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GmatMathPro » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:27 am
FridaKräm wrote:"In a sequence of 8 consecutive integers, how much greater is the sum of the last four integers than the sum of the last four integers?"
I think you may not have typed this quite right.
I solved this question by calculating the arithmetic mean for the two sets and then multipy them with the number of items in each set (4). Which means:
1->4 4 integers x arithmetic number: 2,5 = 10
5->8 4 integers x arithmetic number: 6,5 = 26

The difference is 26-10 = 16

Since the answer key suggests four different solutions and non is the one I used I wonder if "my" method can be applied on other questions like this one?

Thanks!
Frida
Your method is perfectly fine. Notice that it is very similar to the 4th solution they have listed on p. 58. The only difference is they added the numbers directly to find the total, whereas you found the total by multiplying the arithmetic mean by the number of elements. This will always be a valid way to find the total of any group of numbers, as the total is always equal to the average times the number of elements, by definition.
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial
Join the discussion

by neelgandham » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:32 am
Frida,

'Your' method is flawless. Am I sure ? yes I am .

Conventional Method
Step 1: Let the 8 consecutive integers be n, n+1, n+2, n+3, n+4, n+5, n+6, n+7.
Step 2: Sum of first 4 integers = n + n+1 + n+3 + n+4 = 4n + 8
Step 3: Sum of last 4 integers = n+5 + n+6 + n+7 + n+8 = 4n + 26
Step 4: Difference = 4n + 26 - (4n + 8) = 16

'Your' method
Step 1: Let the 8 consecutive integers be n, n+1, n+2, n+3, n+4, n+5, n+6, n+7.
Step 2: Average of first 4 integers = (n + n+1 + n+3 + n+4)/4 = (4n + 8)/4
Step 3: Average of last 4 integers = (n+5 + n+6 + n+7 + n+8)/4 = (4n + 26)/4
Step 4: Average of first 4 integers * 4 = (4n + 8) (Step 2 of the conventional method)
Step 5: Average of last 4 integers * 4 = (4n + 26) (Step 3 of the conventional method)
Step 6: Difference = 4n + 26 - (4n + 8) = 16 (Step 4 of the conventional method)

So, it is nothing but a conventional method using averages(Involving a couple of steps extra!). Finally it is up-to you to decide, because you would want to solve it in a method you are comfortable solving the problem in.

My way ;)
-1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6 be the integers
sum of first four integers = 2
sum of last four integers = 18
difference = 16 Boom!
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:05 am
r r+1 r+2 ....r+7
ignore R since it is constant. see ,that ur last 4 numbers are
4+5+6+7
ur fist 4 numbers are 0+1+2+3

so, (4+5+6+7) - (0+1+2+3)=16
Join the discussion