BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS INTEGER

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cans » Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:54 am
a) 3x + 1 is prime. also as x is integer, 3x+1 can't be 2.
thus 3x+1 is odd or 3x is even. this x is even. x=2 - prime. x=6, not prime
Insufficient
b)5x + 1 is perfect square.
x=16 (81 is perfect square)
x=3 (16 is perfect square)
not sufficient
a&b) x is even. thus 5x+1 is odd and 5x is multiple of 10.
thus 5x+1 =81.
sufficient
IMO C
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by TwiceBitten » Wed Sep 07, 2011 8:59 pm
Cans,

You are assuming that x is 16. in that case 3x+1 would be 49, and it is not prime.
so x can not be 16.

I think the answer is E, but i am not sure.
Join the discussion

by cans » Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:57 am
thanks for that mistake. x should not be 16.
but then also c) is sufficient.
because a) says that 3x+1 is prime and it means x is even. (which includes 2 also)
and with b we can say that 5x+1 is not square when x=2. Thus x=2 is invalid.
Thus x is even >2. Thus x is not prime
IMO C
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!
Join the discussion

by prateek_guy2004 » Thu Sep 08, 2011 9:12 am
Q: IS THE POSITIVE INTEGER X A PRIME NO.

A: 3X + 1 IS A PRIME NO

Example
If x is 2 then its suff
If x is 5 it isint

Not Suff

B: 5X + 1 IS A PERFECT SQUARE

Example

If x = 3 Its suff

If x = 2 it isint

Not suff

If we conclude both the statements

We can solve for x

Hence C
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html
Join the discussion

by Whitney Garner » Thu Sep 08, 2011 10:15 pm
[email protected] wrote:Q: IS THE POSITIVE INTEGER X A PRIME NO.

A: 3X + 1 IS A PRIME NO
B: 5X + 1 IS A PERFECT SQUARE
Hi [email protected]!

Statement (1):
There are 2 basic cases possible: either 3X+1=2, or 3X+1= any other (odd) prime.

If 3X+1=2
3X = 1
X = 1/3, BUT, X is an integer so this case is NOT possible, so it must be the case that 3X+1=odd prime. Let's see what values are possible when we solve that for X:

3X+1 = odd prime
3X = odd prime - 1 (so, because an odd-1 is an even)
3X = even
X = even.

So X will be an even number, because there is one prime even number we must test that:

Let X=2, then 3X+1 = 3(2)+1 = 6+1 = 7 (PRIME), so 3X+1 is prime when X=2 (prime) so the answer to the original question is YES, X is Prime!
Let X=4, then 3X+1 = 3(4)+1 = 12+1 = 13 (PRIME), so 3X+1 is prime when X=4 (non-prime) so the answer to the original question is NO, X is NOT Prime!

We have 2 different answers from statement (1), so NOT sufficient!


Statement (2):
Now for the tougher statement - if 5X+1=perfect square, let's take a look at what this means for X. Call the perfect square Y^2.

5X+1 = Y^2
5X = Y^2 - 1
X = (Y^2 - 1)/5

So, we can find values of INTEGER X by finding perfect squares that are 1 more than a multiple of 5 (so that they will divide evenly). Let's list the perfect squares up to 12 (since we should have those memorized):
1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144

From this list, 16, 36, 81 and 121 are the ones that are 1 more than a multiple of 5. So

X = (16-1)/5 = 15/5 = 3 Prime!
X = (36-1)/5 = 35/5 = 7 Prime!
X = (81-1)/5 = 80/5 = 16 NOT Prime!

We showed two different answers from statement (2) so NOT sufficient!


Statement (1+2):
From statement (1): Integer X is even
From statement (2): Integer X could be several numbers, some even and some odd, but the smallest values is 3.

Putting this together, X is an even number but cannot be 2 so we have our answer - Integer X is NOT a Prime number, therefore, the statements together are Sufficient!

The correct answer is C.

I hope this helps!
:)
Whit
Whitney Garner
GMAT/GRE/EA Instructor & Anxiety/Accommodations Coach
www.whitneygarner.com

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated :heart-eyes:
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Sep 09, 2011 1:03 pm
Whitney Garner wrote:
[email protected] wrote:Q: IS THE POSITIVE INTEGER X A PRIME NO.

A: 3X + 1 IS A PRIME NO
B: 5X + 1 IS A PERFECT SQUARE
Hi [email protected]!

Statement (1):
There are 2 basic cases possible: either 3X+1=2, or 3X+1= any other (odd) prime.

If 3X+1=2
3X = 1
X = 1/3, BUT, X is an integer so this case is NOT possible, so it must be the case that 3X+1=odd prime. Let's see what values are possible when we solve that for X:

3X+1 = odd prime
3X = odd prime - 1 (so, because an odd-1 is an even)
3X = even
X = even.

So X will be an even number, because there is one prime even number we must test that:

Let X=2, then 3X+1 = 3(2)+1 = 6+1 = 7 (PRIME), so 3X+1 is prime when X=2 (prime) so the answer to the original question is YES, X is Prime!
Let X=4, then 3X+1 = 3(4)+1 = 12+1 = 13 (PRIME), so 3X+1 is prime when X=4 (non-prime) so the answer to the original question is NO, X is NOT Prime!

We have 2 different answers from statement (1), so NOT sufficient!


Statement (2):
Now for the tougher statement - if 5X+1=perfect square, let's take a look at what this means for X. Call the perfect square Y^2.

5X+1 = Y^2
5X = Y^2 - 1
X = (Y^2 - 1)/5

So, we can find values of INTEGER X by finding perfect squares that are 1 more than a multiple of 5 (so that they will divide evenly). Let's list the perfect squares up to 12 (since we should have those memorized):
1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144

From this list, 16, 36, 81 and 121 are the ones that are 1 more than a multiple of 5. So

X = (16-1)/5 = 15/5 = 3 Prime!
X = (36-1)/5 = 35/5 = 7 Prime!
X = (81-1)/5 = 80/5 = 16 NOT Prime!

We showed two different answers from statement (2) so NOT sufficient!


Statement (1+2):
From statement (1): Integer X is even
From statement (2): Integer X could be several numbers, some even and some odd, but the smallest values is 3.

Putting this together, X is an even number but cannot be 2 so we have our answer - Integer X is NOT a Prime number, therefore, the statements together are Sufficient!

The correct answer is C.

I hope this helps!
:)
Whit


Ms. GARNER, THANKS. THIS IS REALLY A NICE EXPLANATION FOR THIS QUESTION. I SOLVE THIS QUESTIONS BY PUTTING VALUES. BUT YOUR METHOD IS GREAT AND SAVES TIME. THANK-YOU
Join the discussion