BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Set24-Q.26--P/Q-finite no. of digits

Expert replies
by prachich1987 » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:49 pm
Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits?

(1) P>Q
(2) Q=8

� Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient
� Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient
� BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE
is sufficient.
� EACH statement ALONE is sufficient
� Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by naremnaresh » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:39 pm
BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE
is sufficient
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:53 pm
naremnaresh wrote:BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE
is sufficient
yes the OA is C
Thanks naremnaresh..can u plz explain why both the statements are needed?

I have read somewhere on BTG that if the denominator is in (2^x)*(5^x) form then the we always get decimals ending finitely
Hence 2 is sufficient
It hold true even for P<Q
Lets consider 2/8.The answer is 0.25
Plz advise where I am going wrong?
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:59 pm
prachich1987 wrote:Does the decimal equivalent of P/Q, where P and Q are positive integers, contain only a finite number of nonzero digits?

(1) P>Q
(2) Q=8
Question is P/q is in the form of .3333333333 or .4444444444 or .25 or.23 ,

1) P>Q , let p = 4 and q = 3 , p/q = 1.3333333.

let p = 5 or q = 4 , p/q = 1.25

Not sufficient

2) q = 8 , We are given that p is also a positive integer,

Possible remainders when p is divided by q is 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 0

in every case value of the expression p/q will increase by .125

like 1/8 = .125 , 2/8 = .25 , 3/8 = .375 till 8/8 = 0 (remainder is zero )

so Sufficient

Answer is B
Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------


EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.
Join the discussion

by abhishekg21 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:07 am
one more for B
Join the discussion

by naremnaresh » Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:10 am
from statement 1.
let p=4 and q = 3 then 4/3 = 1.3333333333.................... which is infinite

if you consider both statements q = 8 then
let p =9
9/8 = 1.125
10/8 = 1.25
11/8 = 1.375
........
which is finite.

so both statements are required.
Join the discussion

by naremnaresh » Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:23 am
prachich1987 sorry for the answer
statement 2 is enough.
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:24 am
naremnaresh wrote:from statement 1.
let p=4 and q = 3 then 4/3 = 1.3333333333.................... which is infinite

if you consider both statements q = 8 then
let p =9
9/8 = 1.125
10/8 = 1.25
11/8 = 1.375
........
which is finite.

so both statements are required.
But even in the cases where P<Q, we get final results
So I don't think statement 1 is required.
Join the discussion

by abhishekg21 » Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:12 am
Answer is B. 8 is enought to tell us that we have finite decimal places
P> Q does not tell us anyhting.
Join the discussion

by nespinoz » Sat Dec 25, 2010 3:04 pm
The answer is B, because all number divided by 8 is finited.
Join the discussion