BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Dollars

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Rahul@gurome » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:41 pm
For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:12 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 10:47 pm
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
Thanks Rahul for above.
But if we want to actually calculate the no. of ways for column A,will the answer be 4 ways or it would be more than that?
Plz advise.
Join the discussion

by N:Dure » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:50 pm
Thanks Rahul for your help! I believe since he had 7 correct bills (as in no change) and 3 people to distribute it on, there'll always a remainder and someone will get more than the other.

@ prachich1987: I think there can be more than 4 (1,1,5) (5,1,1) (1,2,4) (1,4,2) (4,1,2)..etc but in the end both ways will yield equal no.s. I don't know how to calculate that though.
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:03 am
N:Dure wrote:Thanks Rahul for your help! I believe since he had 7 correct bills (as in no change) and 3 people to distribute it on, there'll always a remainder and someone will get more than the other.

@ prachich1987: I think there can be more than 4 (1,1,5) (5,1,1) (1,2,4) (1,4,2) (4,1,2)..etc but in the end both ways will yield equal no.s. I don't know how to calculate that though.
Thanks N:dure
There must be more than 4 ways depending on who gets which coins
For e.g set 1--(1,1,5)
it can be like,
Lucia-1 ,Gomez -1,& Demingo-5
or

Lucia-5 ,Gomez -1,& Demingo-1 & many other ways

I just want to know the way to calculate it.
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:12 am
Nice Question.

Actually we don't need to calculate anything.

Check out the Column B : There is no way that you can distribute 7 one dollar bill to three people without having one as at least 3 dollars. So, that means the requirements for Column A and Column B is same.

Hence, they are same.
Join the discussion

by prachich1987 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:17 am
anshumishra wrote:Nice Question.

Actually we don't need to calculate anything.

Check out the Column B : There is no way that you can distribute 7 one dollar bill to three people without having one as at least 3 dollars. So, that means the requirements for Column A and Column B is same.

Hence, they are same.
Thanks anshul for your post above
But I am already clear about the problem posted & just wanted to know the total no. ways of calculating column A ways.
It has nothing to do with this problem.
Sorry for creating confusion.
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:27 am
kapur.arnav wrote:
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss
Lets calculate the number of ways in which 7 one $ bills can be distributed among 3 persons (where each can get 0 or more ) :

Direct formula : n+r-1Cr-1 = 7+3-1C3-1 = 9C2

Other way :

We have these seven dollars and want to distribute to A, B and C : |||||||

So we need two separators to separate the sum (I am using *) : One possible distribution can be shown as :

|| * || * ||| (means A gets 2 $, b gets 3$, and C gets 4$)

You can think of it as a collection of 9 symbols ( with 2 * and 7 "|)
So, the problem reduces to selecting positions of two *, out of 9 symbols = 9C2 (which is same as the formula).

Please note, in this case we have not put the restriction that all the people get at least 1$.

Give it a try!
You can use the same technique with the restrictions that all get at least 1$.
I have left for you to try and let us know.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:19 am
anshumishra wrote:
kapur.arnav wrote:
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss
Lets calculate the number of ways in which 7 one $ bills can be distributed among 3 persons (where each can get 0 or more ) :

Direct formula : n+r-1Cr-1 = 7+3-1C3-1 = 9C2

Other way :

We have these seven dollars and want to distribute to A, B and C : |||||||

So we need two separators to separate the sum (I am using *) : One possible distribution can be shown as :

|| * || * ||| (means A gets 2 $, b gets 3$, and C gets 4$)

You can think of it as a collection of 9 symbols ( with 2 * and 7 "|)
So, the problem reduces to selecting positions of two *, out of 9 symbols = 9C2 (which is same as the formula).

Please note, in this case we have not put the restriction that all the people get at least 1$.

Give it a try!
You can use the same technique with the restrictions that all get at least 1$.
I have left for you to try and let us know.

Thanks
That should be 4+3-1C3-1... as we need to account for atleast 1 to each... we will take n as = 4 and not as 7....
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:43 am
Hahhahah!!

When did BTG becanme beattheGRE??/ Eric r u starting a new website?? U never said us so!!

@Rahul Dada,

I am just immensely surprised by ur quant instincts...superb!!
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:07 am
kapur.arnav wrote:
anshumishra wrote:
kapur.arnav wrote:
Rahul@gurome wrote:For column A, possible distributions are (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
For calculating column B, let us assume that no person gets $3.
So the maximum a person can get is $2.
Even if all 3 get $2,the sum will be 2+2+2 = 6 < 7.
So one person will have to get at least $3.
Hence ultimately, for column B we will get the same distributions : (1, 1, 5), (1, 2, 4), (1, 3, 3), (2, 3, 2).
So both quantities are equal in both the columns.
rahul there is formula also for this if im not mistaken - n+r-1Cr-1... can u elaborate using that!!! thanksss
Lets calculate the number of ways in which 7 one $ bills can be distributed among 3 persons (where each can get 0 or more ) :

Direct formula : n+r-1Cr-1 = 7+3-1C3-1 = 9C2

Other way :

We have these seven dollars and want to distribute to A, B and C : |||||||

So we need two separators to separate the sum (I am using *) : One possible distribution can be shown as :

|| * || * ||| (means A gets 2 $, b gets 3$, and C gets 4$)

You can think of it as a collection of 9 symbols ( with 2 * and 7 "|)
So, the problem reduces to selecting positions of two *, out of 9 symbols = 9C2 (which is same as the formula).

Please note, in this case we have not put the restriction that all the people get at least 1$.

Give it a try!
You can use the same technique with the restrictions that all get at least 1$.
I have left for you to try and let us know.

Thanks
That should be 4+3-1C3-1... as we need to account for atleast 1 to each... we will take n as = 4 and not as 7....
Exactly. So, if you are interested in formula :


The number of ways of dividing n identical items among r persons or objects,with no restrictions : n+r-1Cr-1

The number of ways of dividing n identical items among r persons or objects, each one of whom receives at least 1 item :

n-1Cr-1
, So here it is 7-1C3-1 = 6C2

How to derive it using the illustration I provided :

Just give one "|" each to A, B and C, before considering any distribution.

So, now the problem reduces to distributing 4 "|" and 2 "*" among A,B and C, with no restrictions.

Hence , as above it would be : 6C2.

Thanks
Join the discussion