BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Quant #3

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:58 am
Image

This one I did a few calculations, I know its an easy one, but since I haven't touched elementary math in years, I am totally missing the fundamentals here.

The correct answer as far as I can recall is 2/5.

Can anyone explain?
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by beat_gmat_09 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:16 am
As you know that larger tank can fill in half hours two working together will take less than half hour only a and c remains
now total tank cannot be filled in 1/4 hours (try it) only c remains
hope that helps.
post your questions in problem solving /ds sections for quant
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:12 am
Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Join the discussion

by beat_gmat_09 » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:24 am
anirudhbhalotia wrote:Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Ok, first of all there is a formula for solving this problem

1/A + 1/B = 1/T
Where A is the time taken by Say Person x to perform a work individually and B is time taken by say person y to perform the same work individually and T is the time required to perform the same work when both person x and person y work together, obviously the combined effect will reduce the time, now lets plug our values in this formula
1/1/2 + 1/2 = 1/T

2+1/2 = 1/T
5/2 = 1/T
T = 2/5 = 0.4

other way to solve is logic -
Larger fills in 1/2 - full tank.
1/2 tank by larger in 1/4 hours
Smaller fills in 2 hours - full tank
in 1/2 hours it will fill 1/8 of the tank.
so total tank filled till now - 1/2+1/8 = 5/8, remaining is 3/8
in next 1/4 hour (working same as above) tank will fill to 5/8 + 5/8 = 10/8 approx = 1.2
so slightly less time (less than 1/2 hours) is needed to fill the tank.
1/3 is less, tank will still be left to fill so 2/5 = 0.4 is the answer.
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by anirudhbhalotia » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:33 pm
beat_gmat_09 wrote:
anirudhbhalotia wrote:Oh ok....was not sure where to post it! Will keep in mind henceforth!

I get it that option d and e are ruled out.

but how do I decide between a, b and c.

I may be complicating myself....my way is that, for sure than it would take less than 0.5 hrs.

Now a is 0.25, b is 0.33 and c is 0.4.

So how do we further narrow down our options?
Ok, first of all there is a formula for solving this problem

1/A + 1/B = 1/T
Where A is the time taken by Say Person x to perform a work individually and B is time taken by say person y to perform the same work individually and T is the time required to perform the same work when both person x and person y work together, obviously the combined effect will reduce the time, now lets plug our values in this formula
1/1/2 + 1/2 = 1/T

2+1/2 = 1/T
5/2 = 1/T
T = 2/5 = 0.4

other way to solve is logic -
Larger fills in 1/2 - full tank.
1/2 tank by larger in 1/4 hours
Smaller fills in 2 hours - full tank
in 1/2 hours it will fill 1/8 of the tank.
so total tank filled till now - 1/2+1/8 = 5/8, remaining is 3/8
in next 1/4 hour (working same as above) tank will fill to 5/8 + 5/8 = 10/8 approx = 1.2
so slightly less time (less than 1/2 hours) is needed to fill the tank.
1/3 is less, tank will still be left to fill so 2/5 = 0.4 is the answer.

Wonderful, the first method works like a charm!

2nd method seems complicated to me!
Join the discussion