BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Q and T

Expert replies
by kushal.adhia » Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:40 am
Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

I know this is a simple question but i would really appreciate some help on this...

This is the way i worked it out:

Stmt 1: divide both sides by P^2;
Q>T
Answer is a definite no.

Stmt 2: divide both sides by p^3;
Q>T
Answer is a definite yes.

Hence i chose D... but OA is A

where did i go wrong??

Thanks

Kushal

Source: MGMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:48 am
Careful, don't just cancel out terms on both sides.

1) qp^2 - tp^2 < 0

p^2(q-t) < 0

p^2 can never be <0, thus q-t < 0 => q< t

Sufficient

2)

qp^3 - tp^3 < 0
p^3(q-t) < 0

If p^3 is < 0, then q > t
If p^3 is > 0, then q < t

Not sufficient
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:57 am
kushal.adhia wrote:Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

I know this is a simple question but i would really appreciate some help on this...

This is the way i worked it out:

Stmt 1: divide both sides by P^2;
Q>T
Answer is a definite no.

Stmt 2: divide both sides by p^3;
Q>T
Answer is a definite yes.

Hence i chose D... but OA is A

where did i go wrong??

Thanks

Kushal

Source: MGMAT
Ok, just remember this... while solving such questions remember to check for negative integers, fractions, zero etc before selecting your answer...
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:46 am
kmittal82 wrote:Careful, don't just cancel out terms on both sides.

1) qp^2 - tp^2 < 0

p^2(q-t) < 0

p^2 can never be <0, thus q-t < 0 => q< t

Sufficient

2)

qp^3 - tp^3 < 0
p^3(q-t) < 0

If p^3 is < 0, then q > t
If p^3 is > 0, then q < t

Not sufficient
Hi kmittal82,

I see how you arrived at your answer. Why is it incorrect to cancel out the p^2 or p^3 terms in either statement?
Join the discussion

by vijchid » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:52 pm
Just to show why you cannot cancel the terms

2*-8> 3*-8

if you cancel out the terms -8 you will get 2>3...hope this helps...So when you are not sure about the sign of the number, you cannot cancel out. If you cancel out a negative number, you would have to reverse the inequality.
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:40 pm
vijchid wrote:Just to show why you cannot cancel the terms

2*-8> 3*-8

if you cancel out the terms -8 you will get 2>3...hope this helps...So when you are not sure about the sign of the number, you cannot cancel out. If you cancel out a negative number, you would have to reverse the inequality.
Thanks vijchid.
Join the discussion