BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Q and T

Expert replies
by kushal.adhia » Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:40 am
Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

I know this is a simple question but i would really appreciate some help on this...

This is the way i worked it out:

Stmt 1: divide both sides by P^2;
Q>T
Answer is a definite no.

Stmt 2: divide both sides by p^3;
Q>T
Answer is a definite yes.

Hence i chose D... but OA is A

where did i go wrong??

Thanks

Kushal

Source: MGMAT
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kmittal82 » Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:48 am
Careful, don't just cancel out terms on both sides.

1) qp^2 - tp^2 < 0

p^2(q-t) < 0

p^2 can never be <0, thus q-t < 0 => q< t

Sufficient

2)

qp^3 - tp^3 < 0
p^3(q-t) < 0

If p^3 is < 0, then q > t
If p^3 is > 0, then q < t

Not sufficient
Join the discussion

by kapur.arnav » Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:57 am
kushal.adhia wrote:Is q > t ?

(1) qp^2 < tp^2

(2) qp^3 > tp^3

I know this is a simple question but i would really appreciate some help on this...

This is the way i worked it out:

Stmt 1: divide both sides by P^2;
Q>T
Answer is a definite no.

Stmt 2: divide both sides by p^3;
Q>T
Answer is a definite yes.

Hence i chose D... but OA is A

where did i go wrong??

Thanks

Kushal

Source: MGMAT
Ok, just remember this... while solving such questions remember to check for negative integers, fractions, zero etc before selecting your answer...
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:46 am
kmittal82 wrote:Careful, don't just cancel out terms on both sides.

1) qp^2 - tp^2 < 0

p^2(q-t) < 0

p^2 can never be <0, thus q-t < 0 => q< t

Sufficient

2)

qp^3 - tp^3 < 0
p^3(q-t) < 0

If p^3 is < 0, then q > t
If p^3 is > 0, then q < t

Not sufficient
Hi kmittal82,

I see how you arrived at your answer. Why is it incorrect to cancel out the p^2 or p^3 terms in either statement?
Join the discussion

by vijchid » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:52 pm
Just to show why you cannot cancel the terms

2*-8> 3*-8

if you cancel out the terms -8 you will get 2>3...hope this helps...So when you are not sure about the sign of the number, you cannot cancel out. If you cancel out a negative number, you would have to reverse the inequality.
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:40 pm
vijchid wrote:Just to show why you cannot cancel the terms

2*-8> 3*-8

if you cancel out the terms -8 you will get 2>3...hope this helps...So when you are not sure about the sign of the number, you cannot cancel out. If you cancel out a negative number, you would have to reverse the inequality.
Thanks vijchid.
Join the discussion