BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep Question - Inequality

Expert replies
by dongkim2 » Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:50 am
M + Z > 0?

(1) M - 3Z > 0

(2) 4Z - M > 0

OA: C

[spoiler]Since I couldn't answer for the above based on (1) and (2) individually, I combined (subtraction is not allowed) both inequalities and came up with Z > 0. Based on (1), I came up with M > 3Z > 0. Therefore, I concluded M + Z is greater than 0. Please let me know my reasoning was correct. Thanks![/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by asamaverick » Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:06 pm
Your reasoning is perfectly fine.

There is another way to do this.
Multiply (1) by 5 to get - > 5M - 15Z > 0
Multiply (2) by 4 to get - > 16Z - 4M > 0

Add the two and you get:
M + Z > 0
Join the discussion

by jube » Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:00 am
1) M > 3Z - insuff
2) 4Z > M - insuff.

1&2 combined: 4Z > M > 3Z. So, if:

both M &Z are +ve and M+Z>0
both M&Z are -ve and M+Z<0

Isn't this also insuff. since M+Z can be either positive or negative?
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:09 pm
jube wrote:1) M > 3Z - insuff
2) 4Z > M - insuff.

1&2 combined: 4Z > M > 3Z. So, if:

both M &Z are +ve and M+Z>0
both M&Z are -ve and M+Z<0

Isn't this also insuff. since M+Z can be either positive or negative?
I liked ur way of "out of box " reasoning..But but there is a glitch!

U said very clearly 4Z>M and 4Z> 3Z

So as per ur second statement both M&Z are -ve and M+Z<0

Z cannot be Negative !! :)

If Z is <0 then 4Z cannot be greater that 3Z..That would violate the deductions!!

So for 4Z to be greater than 3Z, Z has to be greater than zero!!

It becomes like 4z>3Z>0 !!
Join the discussion

by jube » Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:43 am
gmatmachoman wrote:
jube wrote:1) M > 3Z - insuff
2) 4Z > M - insuff.

1&2 combined: 4Z > M > 3Z. So, if:

both M &Z are +ve and M+Z>0
both M&Z are -ve and M+Z<0

Isn't this also insuff. since M+Z can be either positive or negative?
I liked ur way of "out of box " reasoning..But but there is a glitch!

U said very clearly 4Z>M and 4Z> 3Z

So as per ur second statement both M&Z are -ve and M+Z<0

Z cannot be Negative !! :)

If Z is <0 then 4Z cannot be greater that 3Z..That would violate the deductions!!

So for 4Z to be greater than 3Z, Z has to be greater than zero!!

It becomes like 4z>3Z>0 !!
Ahh!! I see the mistake I was making! Thank you!
Join the discussion