statements of labor leaders

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:37 am
Location: San Francisco
Thanked: 7 times

statements of labor leaders

by taposh_dr » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:50 pm
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing
America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the
productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic
pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an
unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further
increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing,
management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its
growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of
workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical
weakness in the argument above?
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie
allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders
will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the
absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people,
not with the problems faced by management.
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors-such as
foreign competition-beyond the control of American workers.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:08 pm
taposh_dr wrote:Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.

Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?

Conclusion : There can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.

(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
Correct : We arrived at this answer choice by POE.

(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
Incorrect : If the operation of industry is crippled it will decrease the pie for workers as well as companies.

(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
Incorrect : Does nothing to attack the conclusion.

(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
Incorrect : This is irrelevant to the scope of the argument.

(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors-such as foreign competition-beyond the control of American workers.
Incorrect : It does not talk about wages. Eliminated.


Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Sun May 02, 2010 5:10 am
I had narrowed it down to 'E'.

Could you please explain as to why 'A' is the correct answer?