BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequality and absolute values

Expert replies
by papgust » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:30 am
If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y
(2) |y - x| = x - y

OA: D
Source: Magoosh.com


For these kinds of problems, I've always found plugging in method quite tedious although it's solvable by plugging in. Any easy approach to this problem.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ajith » Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:49 am
papgust wrote:If xy ≠ 0, is x > y?

(1) 4x = 3y
(2) |y - x| = x - y

OA: D
Source: Magoosh.com


For these kinds of problems, I've always found plugging in method quite tedious although it's solvable by plugging in. Any easy approach to this problem.
1) 4x = 3y

True for both of these sets of x and y
x= -3 y =-4 ; x>y
x=3 y =4 ; x<y

Insufficient

2) |y - x| = x - y

y-x is -ve or zero

y-x <=0

x>= y

Insufficient (x can be equal to y)

Combining

sufficient to conclude that x>y

C, Please check OA
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by papgust » Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:17 pm
I'm sorry. It's a typo.

OA is C
Join the discussion

by girish3131 » Mon Mar 08, 2010 5:35 am
@Ajith

i didn't get this point when u say

|y - x| = x - y

y-x is -ve or zero


acc to me eq 2 is sufficient.... ans is B

b'coz

y-x = x-y i.e. x=y

or

y-x = -(x-y) i.e. y-x = y-x # wat to conclude from this point , am not 100% sure...

still i prefer B , on the basis of above info...

Plz correct me if wrong...

TA...
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm
girish3131 wrote:@Ajith

i didn't get this point when u say

|y - x| = x - y

y-x is -ve or zero


acc to me eq 2 is sufficient.... ans is B

b'coz

y-x = x-y i.e. x=y

or

y-x = -(x-y) i.e. y-x = y-x # wat to conclude from this point , am not 100% sure...

still i prefer B , on the basis of above info...

Plz correct me if wrong...

TA...
Let's look at the second statement:

|y - x| = x - y

Absolute value is always positive or zero. Therefore, the left hand side must be positive or zero. The two sides of the equation must be equal. Therefore, the right hand side also must be positive or zero:

x - y >= 0

x >= y

So, as Ajith points out, either x is bigger than y, or else x is equal to y. Because we don't know for sure whether x is bigger than y, this statement is insufficient by itself.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion