BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 12th edition Q # 38

Expert replies
by bhumika.k.shah » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:09 am
38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by raisethebar » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:38 am
Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:40 am
Yes . But what made u say that ?
raisethebar wrote:Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.
Join the discussion

by raisethebar » Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:24 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:Yes . But what made u say that ?
raisethebar wrote:Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.

(1) p1 > p2 -insuff.
(2) r2 > r1 -insuff

but statement 1 says p1 is more and statement 2 says r1 is less

we are interested in finding the ratio p1/r1 and p2/r2

so
greater number(respective to p1/p2) / smaller number(respective to r1,r2) > lesser number(respective to p1/p2) /larger number(respective to r1,r2)

p1/r1 > p2/r2

Let me know if you dont understand this, I will try to explain in other way.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:29 am
I got it !
but is there another approach than this?
like plugging #s or blah!

???
raisethebar wrote:
bhumika.k.shah wrote:Yes . But what made u say that ?
raisethebar wrote:Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.

(1) p1 > p2 -insuff.
(2) r2 > r1 -insuff

but statement 1 says p1 is more and statement 2 says r1 is less

we are interested in finding the ratio p1/r1 and p2/r2

so
greater number(respective to p1/p2) / smaller number(respective to r1,r2) > lesser number(respective to p1/p2) /larger number(respective to r1,r2)

p1/r1 > p2/r2

Let me know if you dont understand this, I will try to explain in other way.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:49 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Say 1000 is the population for District 1 and 2000 is the population for District 2

Say A has 10 representatives and B has 15 representatives

Ratio for D1 = 10/1000 = 1/100 = 4/400
Ratio for D2 = 15/2000 = 3/400

now Say B has 40 reps

Ratio for D1 = 1/100
Ratio for D2 = 40/2000 =2/100

Both of these satisfy conditions 1 and 2 and gives contradicting results
hence E
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:01 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Take the two statements together...

(1) If p1 > p2, then p1/p2 > 1.

(2) If r2 > r1, then r1/r2 < 1.

Hence, p1/p2 > r1/r2

or p1/r1 > p2/r2. DONE

[spoiler]C[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:11 am
sanju09 wrote:
bhumika.k.shah wrote:38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Take the two statements together...

(1) If p1 > p2, then p1/p2 > 1.

(2) If r2 > r1, then r1/r2 < 1.

Hence, p1/p2 > r1/r2

or p1/r1 > p2/r2. DONE

[spoiler]C[/spoiler]
My Mistake!!!! Ignore my post the values I assumed do not follow the conditions
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion